Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream

Open access
Erkal, D, Belokurov, V, Laporte, C F P, Koposov, S E, Li, T S, Grillmair, C J, Kallivayalil, N, Price-Whelan, A M, Evans, N W, Hawkins, K, Hendel, D, Mateu, C, Navarro, J F, del Pino, A, Slater, C T, Sohn, S T, (The OATs: Orphan Aspen Treasury Collaboration)·2019·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

In a companion paper by Koposov et al., RR Lyrae from Gaia Data Release 2 are used to demonstrate that stars in the Orphan stream have velocity vectors significantly misaligned with the stream track, suggesting that it has received a large gravitational perturbation from a satellite of the Milky Way.We argue that such a mismatch cannot arise due to any realistic static Milky Way potential and then explore the perturbative effects of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC).We find that the LMC can produce precisely, the observed motion-track mismatch and we therefore use the Orphan stream to measure the mass of the Cloud.We simultaneously fit the Milky Way and LMC potentials and infer that a total LMC mass of 1.38 +0.27 -0.24 × 10 11 M is required to bend the Orphan stream, showing for the first time that the LMC has a large and measurable effect on structures orbiting the Milky Way.This has far-reaching consequences for any technique which assumes that tracers are orbiting a static Milky Way.Furthermore, we measure the Milky Way mass within 50 kpc to be 3.80 +0.14 -0.11 × 10 11 M .Finally, we use these results to predict that, due to the reflex motion of the Milky Way in response to the LMC, the outskirts of the Milky Way's stellar halo should exhibit a bulk, upwards motion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stz1371

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 132 references

Cited by

See all 357

Metadata

Authors
Erkal, D., Belokurov, V, Laporte, C. F. P., Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., Grillmair, C. J., Kallivayalil, N., Price-Whelan, A. M., Evans, N. W., Hawkins, K., Hendel, D., Mateu, C., Navarro, J. F., del Pino, A., Slater, C. T., Sohn, S. T., & (The OATs: Orphan Aspen Treasury Collaboration)
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
487
Issue
2
Pages
2685-2700
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2904789576
Cited by
357
References
132
FWCI
24.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stz1371
The paper
Erkal, D., Belokurov, V, Laporte, C. F. P., Koposov, S. E., Li, T. S., Grillmair, C. J., Kallivayalil, N., Price-Whelan, A. M., Evans, N. W., Hawkins, K., Hendel, D., Mateu, C., Navarro, J. F., del Pino, A., Slater, C. T., Sohn, S. T., & (The OATs: Orphan Aspen Treasury Collaboration). (2019). The total mass of the Large Magellanic Cloud from its perturbation on the Orphan stream. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1371

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.