Cited by 56Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications

Can a Changing α Explain the Supernovae Results?

Open access
Barrow, John D., Magueijo, João·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We show that the supernovae results, which imply that there is evidence for an accelerating universe, may be closely related to the recent discovery of redshift dependence in the fine-structure constant alpha. The link is a class of varying speed-of-light (VSL) theories that contain cosmological solutions that are similar to quintessence. During the radiation-dominated epoch, the cosmological constant Lambda is prevented from dominating the universe by the usual VSL mechanism. In the matter-dominated epoch, the varying-c effects switch off, allowing Lambda to eventually surface and lead to an accelerating universe. By the time this happens, the residual variations in c imply a changing alpha at a rate that is in agreement with observations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/312572

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the test field case, one should take into account the effect of variation of constants on astrophysical observations because it can affect local physical processes and bias, e.g., supernova luminosity and indirectly modify the distance luminosity-redshift relation.

    “Note however that in such a situation one should take into account the effect of the variation of the constants on the astrophysical observations since it can affect local physical processes and bias, e.g., the luminosity of supernovae and indirectly modify the distance luminosity-redshift relation derived from these observations (Barrow and Magueijo 2000;Riazuelo and Uzan 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barrow, J. D., & O'Toole, C. 1999, preprint (astro-ph/9904116) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrow, J. D., & Magueijo, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-04-01
Volume
532
Issue
2
Pages
L87-L90
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092253463
Cited by
56
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Keywords
variable speed of light, fine-structure constant variation, supernovae, cosmic acceleration, cosmological constant, quintessence, radiation-dominated era, matter-dominated era, cosmological solutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review