Cited by 193Reproductive tract infections researchCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchMicrobial infections and disease research

Evidence for Long‐Term Cervical Persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis by omp1 Genotyping

Dean, Deborah, Suchland, Robert J., Stamm, Walter E.·2000·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infections are common among sexually active women. Although recurrences with a new chlamydial serovar indicate reinfection, same-serovar recurrences may be due to persistence. Because persistence has important implications for pathogenesis and patient management, we identified 552 women with >3 recurrences over 2 years. Among these, 130 women (24%) had same-serovar recurrences; 58 (45%) were C class serovars (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.5; P<.0001). Forty-five isolates from 7 women with 3-10 repeated, same-serovar infections over 2-5 years were studied. As determined by omp1 genotyping, 4 women had identical genotypes at each recurrence; 2 women had 1 or 2 amino acid changes following treatment, and one was persistently infected with a unique genotype, Ja. Many intervening culture-negative samples were positive when tested by ligase chain reaction, which suggests persistence. These data demonstrate that cervical infections with C class serovars can persist for years and may have specific biologic properties that allow for modulation of the major outer membrane protein in response to immune selection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/315778

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dean, D., Suchland, R. J., & Stamm, W. E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dean, Deborah
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2000-09
Volume
182
Issue
3
Pages
909-916
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2083369434
Cited by
193
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 39499, R01AI039499, AI31448)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
Chlamydia trachomatis, cervical infection, persistent infection, recurrent infections, major outer membrane protein, reinfection, immune selection, ligase chain reaction, sexually transmitted infections
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Base Sequence, Uterine Cervicitis, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Doxycycline, Female, Genotype, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Retrospective Studies, Azithromycin, Porins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review