Evidence for Long‐Term Cervical Persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis by omp1 Genotyping
Abstract
Recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infections are common among sexually active women. Although recurrences with a new chlamydial serovar indicate reinfection, same-serovar recurrences may be due to persistence. Because persistence has important implications for pathogenesis and patient management, we identified 552 women with >3 recurrences over 2 years. Among these, 130 women (24%) had same-serovar recurrences; 58 (45%) were C class serovars (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.5; P<.0001). Forty-five isolates from 7 women with 3-10 repeated, same-serovar infections over 2-5 years were studied. As determined by omp1 genotyping, 4 women had identical genotypes at each recurrence; 2 women had 1 or 2 amino acid changes following treatment, and one was persistently infected with a unique genotype, Ja. Many intervening culture-negative samples were positive when tested by ligase chain reaction, which suggests persistence. These data demonstrate that cervical infections with C class serovars can persist for years and may have specific biologic properties that allow for modulation of the major outer membrane protein in response to immune selection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persistent Chlamydia infection can last for many years, and the persistent Chlamydia bacteria can re-activate.
“Persistent Chlamydia infection can last for many years, and the persistent Chlamydia bacteria can re-activate41,42.”
From Chlamydia pneumoniae can infect the central nervous system via the olfactory and trigeminal nerves and contributes to Alzheimer’s disease risk (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singh, D., Fine, D. N., & Marrazzo, J. M. (2011) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.169631 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Chacko, A., Delbaz, A., Walkden, H., Basu, S., Armitage, C. W., Eindorf, T., Trim, L. K., Miller, E., West, N. P., St John, J. A., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-06749-9 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dean, D., Suchland, R. J., & Stamm, W. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of Washington Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dean, Deborah
- ORCID
- Dean, Deborah
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 909-916
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W2083369434
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 39499, R01AI039499, AI31448)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Keywords
- Chlamydia trachomatis, cervical infection, persistent infection, recurrent infections, major outer membrane protein, reinfection, immune selection, ligase chain reaction, sexually transmitted infections
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Base Sequence, Uterine Cervicitis, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Doxycycline, Female, Genotype, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Retrospective Studies, Azithromycin, Porins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review