Cited by 69Reproductive tract infections researchCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Chlamydia trachomatis Infection Among Women Reporting Sexual Activity With Women Screened in Family Planning Clinics in the Pacific Northwest, 1997 to 2005

Open access
Singh, Devika, Fine, David N., Marrazzo, Jeanne M.·2011·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to define Chlamydia trachomatis positivity among women who report sexual activity with women, a population for which sparse data on this infection are available and for whom health disparities including challenged access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health services, have been reported. METHODS: We analyzed data from 9358 family planning clinic visits with C trachomatis tests among women aged 15 to 24 years who reported sexual activity within the past year exclusively with women (WSW) or with men and women (WSMW), in the Region X Infertility Prevention Project. Characteristics were compared with women who reported sexual activity exclusively with men (WSM). Results. C trachomatis positivity among both WSW and WSMW was 7.1%, compared with 5.3% among WSM. Behavioral risks were more commonly reported by WSW and WSMW, compared with reports by WSM. Risks for C trachomatis positivity were comparable across groups and included younger age, non-White race, behavioral risks, and clinical signs. CONCLUSIONS: Higher C trachomatis positivity among women reporting same-sex sexual behavior supports investigation into potential explanatory factors, including sexual behaviors, biological susceptibility, routine C trachomatis screening disparities, sexual identity disclosure, and sexual network assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.169631

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [18]Dicker LW, Mosure DJ, Levine WC. C. trachomatis positivity versus prevalence: what's the difference? Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25(5):251–253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [19]Stamm WE. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult. : Holmes K, Sparling P, Stamm W, et al., Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 4th ed New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2008:575–593 [Google Scholar]
  3. [30]Marrazzo JM, Cassells S, Ringwood K. Characteristics of young bisexual women's relationships with their male partners. Oral presentation at: 2006 National STD Prevention Conference, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; May 8–10, 2006; Jacksonville, FL [Google Scholar]
  4. [42]Adimora AA, Schoenbach V. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of STI. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(suppl 1):S115–S122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, D., Fine, D. N., & Marrazzo, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2011-07
Volume
101
Issue
7
Pages
1284-1290
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2140705016
Cited by
69
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
Chlamydia trachomatis, women who have sex with women, same-sex sexual behavior, sexually transmitted infections, family planning clinics, screening disparities, sexual risk behavior, coming out, young women, Pacific Northwest
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Ambulatory Care Facilities, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Northwestern United States, Confidence Intervals, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Homosexuality, Female, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review