The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Origin of Interspecific Genomic Incompatibility via Gene Duplication
Abstract
One of the great unsolved mysteries of evolutionary biology concerns the genetic mechanisms underlying the origin of genomic incompatibilities between species. Two prevailing thoughts are that such incompatibilities often result from epistatically interacting genes that act as loss-of-function alleles in hybrid backgrounds or from chromosomal rearrangements that result in mis-segregation during meiosis in hybrids. However, it is unclear how genes that cause a radical breakdown in hybrids arise without reducing fitness within species, and numerous cases of speciation appear to be unassociated with obvious chromosomal rearrangements. Here we suggest that duplicate genes, and more generally any kind of genomic redundancies, provide a powerful substrate for the origin of genomic incompatibilities in isolated populations. The divergent resolution of genomic redundancies, such that one population loses function from one copy while the second population loses function from a second copy at a different chromosomal location, leads to chromosomal repatterning such that gametes produced by hybrid individuals can be completely lacking in functional genes for a duplicate pair. Under this model, incompatibility factors accumulate with essentially no loss of fitness within populations as postulated under the Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller (BDM) model of speciation and despite the fact that they arise from degenerative mutations. However, unlike the situation often envisioned under the BDM model, no change in the mode of gene action in hybrid backgrounds need be invoked. The plausibility of this model derives from a number of recent observations, including the fact that most genomes harbor substantial numbers of gene duplicates whose turnover is common and ongoing process and the fact that many genes have complex regulatory regions that facilitate their divergent resolution in sister taxa.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolutionary Fate and Consequences of Duplicate Genes
Lynch, M., & Conery, J. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5494.1151 · Cited by 4,988
Self-citationComparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698 · cited 2×
“For example, 40%–50% of the genes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and in the fly Drosophila melanogaster are recognizable duplicates of various ages (Rubin et al. 2000).”
BackgroundEichler, E. (1997) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/6.7.991 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants
Panchy, N., Lehti-Shiu, M., & Shiu, S.-H. (2016) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.16.00523 · Cited by 1,757
Genomics and the origin of species
Seehausen, O., Butlin, R. K., Keller, I., Wagner, C. E., Boughman, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Peichel, C. L., Saetre, G.-P., Bank, C., Brännström, Å., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3644 · Cited by 1,016
Genome evolution and biodiversity in teleost fish
Volff, J.-N. (2005) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800635 · Cited by 677
The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants
Lowry, D. B., Modliszewski, J. L., Wright, K. M., Wu, C. A., & Willis, J. H. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0064 · Cited by 496
DNA Barcoding Will Often Fail to Discover New Animal Species over Broad Parameter Space
Hickerson, M. J., Meyer, C. P., & Moritz, C. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600969898 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynch, M., & Force, A. G.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 590-605
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2052051563
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 22.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Origin of Interspecific Genomic Incompatibility via Gene Duplication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/316992
- The paper
- Lynch, M., & Force, A. G. (2000). The Origin of Interspecific Genomic Incompatibility via Gene Duplication. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/316992
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.