The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of Line‐driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei
Open accessAbstract
We present the results of axisymmetric time-dependent hydrodynamic calculations of line-driven winds from accretion disks in active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We assume the disk is flat, Keplerian, geometrically thin, and optically thick, radiating according to the α-disk prescription. The central engine of the AGN is a source of both ionizing X-rays and wind-driving UV photons. To calculate the radiation force, we take into account radiation from the disk and the central engine. The gas temperature and ionization state in the wind are calculated self-consistently from the photoionization and heating rate of the central engine. We find that a disk accreting onto a 10 8 M ☉ black hole at the rate of 1.8 M ☉ yr -1 can launch a wind at ~10 16 cm from the central engine. The X-rays from the central object are significantly attenuated by the disk atmosphere so they cannot prevent the local disk radiation from pushing matter away from the disk. However, in the supersonic portion of the flow high above the disk, the X-rays can overionize the gas and decrease the wind terminal velocity. For a reasonable X-ray opacity, e.g., κ X = 40 g -1 cm 2 , the disk wind can be accelerated by the central UV radiation to velocities of up to 15,000 km s -1 at a distance of ~10 17 cm from the central engine. The covering factor of the disk wind is ~0.2. The wind is unsteady and consists of an opaque, slow vertical flow near the disk that is bounded on the polar side by a high-velocity stream. A typical column density through the fast stream is a few times 10 23 cm -2 so the stream is optically thin to the UV radiation. This low column density is precisely why gas can be accelerated to high velocities. The fast stream contributes nearly 100% to the total wind mass-loss rate of 0.5 M ☉ yr -1 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dynamics of Line‐driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Effects of Disk Radiation
Proga, D., & Kallman, T. R. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/425117 · Cited by 527
Self-citationUnusual Broad Absorption Line Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Hall, P. B., Anderson, S. F., Strauss, M. A., York, D. G., Richards, G. T., Fan, X., Knapp, G. R., Schneider, D. P., Vanden Berk, D. E., Geballe, T. R., et al. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/340546 · Cited by 377
The diversity of quasars unified by accretion and orientation
Shen, Y., & Ho, L. C. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13712 · Cited by 373
FORMING COMPACT MASSIVE GALAXIES
van Dokkum, P. G., Nelson, E. J., Franx, M., Oesch, P., Momcheva, I., Brammer, G., Schreiber, N. M. F., Skelton, R. E., Whitaker, K. E., Wel, A. V. D., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/23 · Cited by 311
A Comparison of Stellar and Gaseous Kinematics in the Nuclei of Active Galaxies
Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/430590 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-11-10
- Volume
- 543
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 686-696
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2027058913
- Cited by
- 878
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of Line‐driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317154
- The paper
- Proga, D., Stone, J. M., & Kallman, T. R. (2000). Dynamics of Line‐driven Disk Winds in Active Galactic Nuclei. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/317154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.