The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gynoecium Structure and Evolution in Basal Angiosperms
Abstract
A comparative study on gynoecium structure in basal angiosperms revealed new features relevant to systematics. In addition, based on the new phylogenetic framework on basal angiosperms gained by molecular systematics, an evolutionary evaluation of gynoecial character states has become possible. Angiospermy patterns are diverse and are here tentatively grouped into four types according to the mode of carpel closure: (1) by secretion, without postgenital fusion; (2) with a continuous secretory canal but partial postgenital fusion at the periphery; (3) with an incomplete secretory canal and complete postgenital fusion at the periphery; (4) by complete postgenital fusion. In most basal angiosperms the carpels are free, and the inner space of each carpel is occluded from the outside by secretion and not by postgenital fusion (angiospermy type 1). Correlated with this feature is a pronounced ascidiate shape of the carpels. The carpels tend to be shortly stipitate. In relatively many basal clades with pluricarpellate gynoecia an extragynoecial compitum is present. Stigmas are secretory and tend to have pluricellular papillae. Ethereal oil cells at the surface of the carpels (probably intrusive) are present in Illiciales (including Trimeniaceae), Chloranthaceae, Piperales s.l. (including Aristolochiales), and Acoraceae. Ovule structure is diverse. Ovules are predominantly anatropous. Although Amborellaceae, the phylogenetically earliest branching extant angiosperm, has orthotropous ovules, it is argued that the anatropous condition is basal in angiosperms. Crassinucellar ovules are predominant in basal angiosperms. However, there are apomorphic tendencies toward ovule reduction: weakly crassinucellar (Nymphaeales, some Alismatales), pseudocrassinucellar (Acorales, some Alismatales, some Ranunculales), and tenuinucellar (some Piperales s.l., including Aristolochiales, Rafflesiales, some Alismatales). Lobation of the inner integument and semiannular shape of the outer integument are variously present or absent. They appear to be due to architectural constraints in ovule development and not to constitute archaic features. In contrast to anatropous ovules, orthotropous ovules often have an outer integument that is thinner than the inner one. This may be due to a function of the outer integument in ovule curvature as indicated by molecular developmental genetics. On the other hand, the presence of an outer integument that is thinner than the inner one characterizes the majority of the Piperales s.l. (including Aristolochiales), irrespective of presence or absence of ovule curvature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Ordinal Classification for the Families of Flowering Plants
(1998) · Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden · doi:10.2307/2992015 · Cited by 1,465
Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences
SOLTIS, D. (2000) · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bojl.2000.0380 · Cited by 1,331
University Press, C. (2021) · doi:10.26226/morressier.60c8d83cbea1445efd9a1905 · Cited by 1,215
The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes
Qiu, Y.-L., Lee, J., Bernasconi-Quadroni, F., Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Zanis, M., Zimmer, E. A., Chen, Z., Savolainen, V., & Chase, M. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46536 · Cited by 842
Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology
Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., & Chase, M. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/46528 · Cited by 798
The origin and early diversification of angiosperms
Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M., & Pedersen, K. R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374027a0 · Cited by 785
The Root of Angiosperm Phylogeny Inferred from Duplicate Phytochrome Genes
Mathews, S., & Donoghue, M. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.947 · Cited by 440
Morphology of the Angiosperms.
Johnson, M. A., & Eames, A. J. (1961) · Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club · doi:10.2307/2482553 · Cited by 438
Doyle, J. A., & Endress, P. K. (2000) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/317578 · Cited by 394
Self-citationUtility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms
Graham, S. W., & Olmstead, R. G. (2000) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.2307/2656749 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Molecular and fossil evidence on the origin of angiosperms
Doyle, J. A. (2012) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105313 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Endress, P. K., & Igersheim, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Plant Sciences
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- S6
- Pages
- S211-S213
- ISSN
- 1058-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5315
- OpenAlex
- W2173655996
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gynoecium Structure and Evolution in Basal Angiosperms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/317572
- The paper
- Endress, P. K., & Igersheim, A. (2000). Gynoecium Structure and Evolution in Basal Angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1086/317572
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.