Cited by 189Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

Constraining the Accretion Rate onto Sagittarius A* Using Linear Polarization

Open access
Quataert, Eliot, Gruzinov, Andrei·2000·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Two possible explanations for the low luminosity of the supermassive black hole at the center of our Galaxy are (1) an accretion rate of the order of the canonical Bondi value (~10 -5 M ☉ yr -1 ) but a very low radiative efficiency for the accreting gas or (2) an accretion rate much less than the Bondi rate. Both models can explain the broadband spectrum of the Galactic center. We show that they can be distinguished using the linear polarization of synchrotron radiation. Accretion at the Bondi rate predicts no linear polarization at any frequency because of Faraday depolarization. Low accretion rate models, on the other hand, have much lower gas densities and magnetic field strengths close to the black hole; polarization may therefore be observable at high frequencies. If confirmed, a recent detection of linear polarization from Sgr A* at ≳150 GHz argues for an accretion rate of ~10 -8 M ☉ yr -1 , much less than the Bondi rate. This test can be applied to other low-luminosity galactic nuclei.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/317845

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different theoretical models for the accretion flow produce an accretion rate in the range of 10^-9-10^-8 M⊙/yr.

    “Different theoretical models for the accretion flow 9 produce an accretion rate in the range of 10 -9 -10 -8 M ⊙ yr -1 (Agol 2000; Quataert & Gruzinov 2000; Yuan et al. 2004; Marrone et al. 2007; Sharma et al. 2007).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Quataert & Gruzinov 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quataert, E., & Gruzinov, A.
Affiliations
Institute for Advanced Study (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2000-12-20
Volume
545
Issue
2
Pages
842-846
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2084844543
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Sgr A*, supermassive black holes, accretion rate, Bondi accretion, linear polarization, synchrotron radiation, Faraday depolarization, Galactic Center, magnetic field, radiative efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review