CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On Misconceptions of Evolutionary Archaeology: Confusing Macroevolution and Microevolution

Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J.·2001·Current Anthropology
DOI 10.1086/320477
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/320477

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.2307/279244 · DOI
  2. Eldredge N., Revised edition. Time frames: The evolution of punctuated equilibrium
  3. The pattern of evolution
  4. Eldredge N., Schopf, 82115
  5. Gould S. J., Grene, 7193
  6. 1986, American Scientist, 74, 96118
  7. 1987, Natural History, 96, 1423
  8. Fitch and F. J. Ayala, 12544
  9. 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mayr E., 1961, Science, 134, 15016, 10.1126/science.134.3479.607.a · DOI
  11. Hurt and G. F. M. Rakita, 2540
  12. Brien M. J., 2000, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
  13. 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0460 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Lyman, R. L., & O’Brien, M. J.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Published
2001-06
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
408-409
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
DOI
10.1086/320477
Cited by
15
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review