The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution
Abstract
Interpersonal preferences—preferences that depend on the characteristics of others—are typically hard to infer from observable individual behavior. As an alternative approach, this paper uses survey data to investigate interpersonal preferences. I show that self‐reported attitudes toward welfare spending are determined not only by financial self‐interest but also by interpersonal preferences. These interpersonal preferences are characterized by a negative exposure effect—individuals decrease their support for welfare as the welfare recipiency rate in their community rises—and racial group loyalty—individuals increase their support for welfare spending as the share of local recipients from their own racial group rises. These findings help to explain why levels of welfare benefits are relatively low in racially heterogeneous states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003) · Journal of Economic Growth · doi:10.1023/a:1024471506938 · Cited by 3,432
The Death Toll from Natural Disasters: The Role of Income, Geography, and Institutions
Kahn, M. E. (2005) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/0034653053970339 · Cited by 1,393
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428
The Two Facets of Social Policy Preferences
Cavaillé, C., & Trump, K.-S. (2015) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/678312 · Cited by 241
Does Immigration Undermine Public Support for Social Policy?
Brady, D., & Finnigan, R. (2014) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413513022 · Cited by 239
Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality
Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2008) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y · Cited by 233
National Identity and Political Trust
Berg, L., & Hjerm, M. (2010) · Perspectives on European Politics and Society · doi:10.1080/15705854.2010.524403 · Cited by 158
Extreme Reactions: Radical Right Mobilization in Eastern Europe
Bustikova, L. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108697248 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Luttmer, E. F. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 500-528
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2121428394
- Cited by
- 1,001
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 161.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.