The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does the Dose Matter?
Open accessAbstract
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, such as the ratio of peak to minimum inhibitory concentration (peak/MIC ratio), ratio of 24-hour area under the curve to MIC (24-h AUC/MIC ratio), and the time above MIC, are good indicators of the drug dose-organism interaction. Time above the MIC is the important determinant of the activity of beta-lactams, macrolides, clindamycin, and linezolid. Free drug serum levels of these drugs should be above the MIC for at least 40%-50% of the dosing interval to produce adequate clinical and microbiological efficacy. Peak/MIC and 24-h AUC/MIC ratios are major determinants of the activity of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. In general, peak/MIC ratios should exceed 8 and 24-h AUC/MIC values should be >100 to successfully treat gram-negative bacillary infections and to prevent the emergence of resistant organisms during therapy. The successful treatment of pneumococcal infections with fluoroquinolones and azithromycin appear to require 24-h AUC/MIC ratios of only 25-35. Mutation prevention concentrations are being reported for various fluoroquinolones with different pathogens, but their clinical significance has not yet been established. More information is needed on the role of PK/PD parameters and their magnitude for preventing mutations and the emergence of resistant organisms for most classes of antibiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'
Drusano, G. L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro862 · Cited by 930
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Antibacterial Agents
Levison, M. E., & Levison, J. H. (2009) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.008 · Cited by 557
Antimicrobial Treatment Guidelines for Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis
Partnership, S. A. A. H. (2004) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.003 · Cited by 535
The mutant selection window and antimicrobial resistance
Drlica, K. (2003) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkg269 · Cited by 437
Pharmacodynamic Functions: a Multiparameter Approach to the Design of Antibiotic Treatment Regimens
Regoes, R. R., Wiuff, C., Zappala, R. M., Garner, K. N., Baquero, F., & Levin, B. R. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.10.3670-3676.2004 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, W. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09-15
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- s3
- Pages
- S233-S237
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2162398839
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does the Dose Matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/321854
- The paper
- Craig, W. A. (2001). Does the Dose Matter? Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/321854
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.