Cited by 16Gut microbiota and healthClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Inhibition of Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococci by an In Vitro Continuous‐Flow Competitive Exclusion Culture Containing Human Stool Flora

Donskey, Curtis J., Hume, Michael E., Callaway, Todd R., Das, Sarbani M., Hoyen, Claudia K., Rice, Louis B.·2001·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

An in vitro anaerobic continuous-flow competitive exclusion (CFCE) culture model was used to study the ability of human stool flora to inhibit the growth of vancomycin-resistant (VR) enterococci (VRE). The CFCE culture was established from a stool sample obtained from a healthy adult. When 10(3) or 10(6) cfu/mL of VR Enterococcus faecium were added to the CFCE culture, the VRE were eliminated within 6 or 9 days, respectively. When 10(7) cfu/mL of the CFCE culture was added to a continuous-flow culture that contained 10(7) cfu/mL of VRE, the density of VRE was reduced but not eliminated. These data support the hypothesis that the indigenous intestinal flora inhibit growth of VRE and suggest that CFCE cultures may be a useful means to study interactions between the indigenous flora and VRE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/324533

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donskey, C. J., Hume, M. E., Callaway, T. R., Das, S. M., Hoyen, C. K., & Rice, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2001-12-15
Volume
184
Issue
12
Pages
1624-1627
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2152226385
Cited by
16
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Enterococcus faecium, competitive exclusion, continuous flow culture, intestinal bacteria, antimicrobial resistance, in vitro culture model, bacterial growth inhibition
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Antibiosis, Bacteria, Bacteriological Techniques, Culture Media, Feces, Humans, Colony Count, Microbial, Enterococcus faecium, Vancomycin Resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review