Cited by 32Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityIncome, Poverty, and InequalityExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Perceptions of Equity and the Distribution of Income

Rotemberg, Julio J.·2002·Journal of Labor Economics

Abstract

This article develops a model in which quit rates, and thus the income distribution, depend on employee perceptions of the accuracy of employer assessments of individual productivity because these latter assessments affect wages. When employees believe that these assessments are accurate, income inequality tends to be high. The model can account for the negative correlation across some countries of inequality and the extent to which inequality is deemed to be excessive. It also fits the contrast in U.S. and French experiences concerning the tenure of highly educated workers with high wages relative to the tenure of lower‐paid workers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/338218

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1111/1468-0262.00020 · DOI
  2. Abraham Katharine G, 1987, American Economic Review, 77, 278
  3. 10.3386/w5605 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/1885099 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Atkinson Anthony B, 1995, Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe, edited by Anthony B. Atkinson
  6. Bernstein Jared, 1997, Monthly Labor Review, 120, 3
  7. 10.1111/1468-0262.00022 · DOI
  8. Burgess Simon, 1999, Performance Discussion Paper no. 416.
  9. 10.1111/1467-8543.00111 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/wber/10.3.565 · DOI
  11. Evans Geoffrey, 1993, International Social Attitudes: The Tenth BSA Report
  12. Farber Henry, 1998, Labor Statistics Measurement Issues, Studies in Income and Wealth, 60
  13. Feagin Joe R, 1975, Subordinating the Poor
  14. Hochschild Jennifer, 1981, Cambridge
  15. Kluegel James, 1986, Beliefs about Inequality
  16. 10.4159/harvard.9780674428522 · DOI
  17. 10.1086/261738 · DOI
  18. Moss David A, 1995, Case 9‐795‐064.
  19. 10.2307/2946692 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/001979399604900212 · DOI
  21. Uchitelle Louis, 1994, New York Times

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 32

Metadata

Authors
Rotemberg, J. J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Rotemberg, Julio J.
Venue
Journal of Labor Economics
Published
2002-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
249-288
ISSN
  • 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5307
OpenAlex
W2160821405
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
income distribution, income inequality, quit rates, productivity analysis, wage determination, employee perceptions, job tenure, highly educated workers, wage inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of Equity and the Distribution of Income. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338218
The paper
Rotemberg, J. J. (2002). Perceptions of Equity and the Distribution of Income. Journal of Labor Economics. https://doi.org/10.1086/338218