The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory
Abstract
Many accounts of the micro‐macro link use the philosophical notion of emergence to argue that collective phenomena are collaboratively created by individuals yet are not reducible to explanation in terms of individuals. However, emergence has also been invoked by methodological individualists; they accept the existence of emergent social properties yet claim that such properties can be reduced to explanations in terms of individuals and their relationships. Thus, contemporary sociological uses of emergence are contradictory and unstable. This article clarifies this situation by developing an account of emergence based in contemporary philosophy of mind. The philosophical account is used to evaluate contradictory sociological theories. Several unresolved issues facing theories of emergence in sociology are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 21,166
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
Exchange and Power in Social Life
Blau, P. M. (2017) · doi:10.4324/9780203792643 · Cited by 15,923
(1951) · Cited by 8,693
Gamst, F. C. (1991) · Anthropology of Work Review · doi:10.1525/awr.1991.12.3.19 · Cited by 7,932
Homans, G. C. (1958) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/222355 · Cited by 5,350
Dynamic models of segregation†
Schelling, T. C. (1971) · The Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.1971.9989794 · Cited by 4,915
Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms
Hollander, E. P., & Homans, G. C. (1963) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419191 · Cited by 4,692
The Rules of Sociological Method
Durkheim, E. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9 · Cited by 4,661
The Architecture of Complexity
Simon, H. A. (1991) · Facets of Systems Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_31 · Cited by 4,433
Cited by
Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology
Hedstrom, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488801 · Cited by 816
(2005) · Cited by 772
A cultural theory of international relations
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-2254 · Cited by 379
Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113 · Cited by 280
Cooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks
Eguíluz, V. M., Zimmermann, M. G., Cela‐Conde, C. J., & Miguel, M. S. (2005) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/428716 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawyer, R. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-585
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2170166728
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 110
- FWCI
- 25.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338780
- The paper
- Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/338780
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
