The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Properties of Relativistic Jets in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows
Open accessAbstract
We extend our calculation of physical parameters of gamma-ray burst (GRB) jets by modeling the broadband emission of the afterglows 970508, 980519, 991208, 000926, 000418, and 010222. Together with 990123, 990510, 991216, and 000301c, there are 10 well-observed afterglows for which the initial opening angle of the GRB jet can be constrained. The jet energies (after the GRB phase) obtained for this set of afterglows are within one decade around 5 × 10 50 ergs. With the exception of 000418, which requires a jet wider than rad, the jet initial half-angle in the other cases ranges from 2° to 20°. We find that in half of the cases, a homogeneous ambient medium accommodates the afterglow emission better than the windlike r -2 profile medium expected around massive stars. The two types of media give fits of comparable quality in four cases, with a wind medium providing a better description only for 970508. The circumburst densities we obtain are in the 0.1-100 cm -3 range, with the exception of 990123, for which it is below 10 -2 cm -3 . If in all 10 cases the observed GRB durations are a good measure of the ejecta deceleration timescale, then the parameters obtained here lead to jet Lorentz factors at the deceleration radius between 70 and 300, anticorrelated with the jet initial aperture, and jet masses around 10 -6 M ☉ . Our results on the jet energy, opening Lorentz factor, and evacuation of material until breakout provide constraints on theoretical models of GRB jets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Supernova–Gamma-Ray Burst Connection
Woosley, S. E., & Bloom, J. S. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150558 · Cited by 1,766
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
“Previous analyses using late-time afterglow data (e.g., Panaitescu & Kumar 2002; Yost et al. 2003) have also suggested that most afterglow data are consistent with an ISMmodel rather than a windmodel.”
BackgroundMethodResultThe physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationEvidence for a Canonical Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curve in the Swift XRT Data
Nousek, J. A., Kouveliotou, C., Grupe, D., Page, K. L., Granot, J., Ramirez‐Ruiz, E., Patel, S. K., Burrows, D. N., Mangano, V., Barthelmy, S., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500724 · Cited by 886
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Metadata
- Authors
- Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 571
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 779-789
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2024776596
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of Relativistic Jets in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/340094
- The paper
- Panaitescu, A., & Kumar, P. (2002). Properties of Relativistic Jets in Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglows. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/340094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.