Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 645

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrodynamics of Magnetars: Implications for the Persistent X‐Ray Emission and Spin‐down of the Soft Gamma Repeaters and Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsars

Open access
Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., Kulkarni, S. R.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We consider the structure of neutron star magnetospheres threaded by large-scale electrical currents and the effect of resonant Compton scattering by the charge carriers (both electrons and ions) on the emergent X-ray spectra and pulse profiles. In the magnetar model for the soft gamma repeaters (SGRs) and anomalous X-ray pulsars (AXPs), these currents are maintained by magnetic stresses acting deep inside the star, which generate both sudden disruptions (SGR outbursts) and more gradual plastic deformations of the rigid crust. We construct self-similar force-free equilibria of the current-carrying magnetosphere with a power-law dependence of magnetic field on radius, ∝ r -(2+ p ) , and show that a large-scale twist of field lines softens the radial dependence of the magnetic field to p < 1. The spin-down torque acting on the star is thereby increased in comparison with an orthogonal vacuum dipole. We comment on the strength of the surface magnetic field in the SGR and AXP sources, as inferred from their measured spin-down rates, and the implications of this model for the narrow measured distribution of spin periods. A magnetosphere with a strong twist [ B ϕ / B θ = O (1) at the equator] has an optical depth ~1 to resonant cyclotron scattering, independent of frequency (radius), surface magnetic field strength, or charge/mass ratio of the scattering charge. When electrons and ions supply the current, the stellar surface is also heated by the impacting charges at a rate comparable to the observed X-ray output of the SGR and AXP sources, if B dipole ~ 10 14 G. Redistribution of the emerging X-ray flux at the cyclotron resonance will strongly modify the emerging pulse profile and, through the Doppler effect, generate a nonthermal tail to the X-ray spectrum. We relate the sudden change in the pulse profile of SGR 1900+14 following the 1998 August 27 giant flare to an enhanced optical depth at the electron cyclotron resonance resulting from a sudden twist imparted to the external magnetic field during the flare. The self-similar structure of the magnetosphere should generate frequency-independent profiles; more complicated pulse profiles may reflect the presence of higher multipoles, ion cyclotron scattering, or possibly nonresonant Compton scattering of O -mode photons by pair-loaded currents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/340586

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 645

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., & Kulkarni, S. R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-07-20
Volume
574
Issue
1
Pages
332-355
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2158677910
Cited by
645
References
0
FWCI
13.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrodynamics of Magnetars: Implications for the Persistent X‐Ray Emission and Spin‐down of the Soft Gamma Repeaters and Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/340586
The paper
Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., & Kulkarni, S. R. (2002). Electrodynamics of Magnetars: Implications for the Persistent X‐Ray Emission and Spin‐down of the Soft Gamma Repeaters and Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsars. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/340586

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.