The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Major Soft Gamma Repeater-like Outburst and Rotation Glitch in the No-longer-so-anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 2259+586
Open accessAbstract
We report a major outburst from the anomalous X-ray pulsar 1E 2259+586, in which over 80 X-ray bursts were detected in 4 hr using the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer . The bursts range in duration from 2 ms to 3 s and have fluences in the 2-10 keV band that range from 3 × 10 -11 to 5 × 10 -9 ergs cm -2 . We simultaneously observed increases of the pulsed and persistent X-ray emission by over an order of magnitude relative to quiescent levels. Both decayed significantly during the course of our 14 ks observation. Correlated spectral hardening was also observed, with the spectrum softening during the observation. In addition, we observed a pulse profile change, in which the amplitudes of the two peaks in the pulse profile were swapped. The profile relaxed back to its pre-outburst morphology after ~6 days. The pulsar also underwent a sudden spin-up (Δν/ν = 4 × 10 -6 ), followed by a large (factor of ~2) increase in spin-down rate that persisted for more than 18 days. We also observed, using the Gemini North telescope, an infrared enhancement, in which the K s (2.15 μm) flux increased, relative to that measured in a observation made in 2000, by a factor of ~3, 3 days post-outburst. The IR counterpart then faded by a factor of ~2 1 week later. In addition, we report an upper limit of 50 μJy on radio emission at 1.4 GHz 2 days post-outburst. The X-ray properties of this outburst are like those seen only in soft gamma repeaters. This conclusively unifies anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma repeaters, as predicted uniquely by the magnetar model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. (1995) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/275.2.255 · Cited by 1,588
Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/178147 · Cited by 1,164
An X-ray pulsar with a superstrong magnetic field in the soft γ-ray repeater SGR1806 − 20
Kouveliotou, C., Dieters, S., Strohmayer, T., van Paradijs, J., Fishman, G. J., Meegan, C. A., Hurley, K., Kommers, J., Smith, I., Frail, D., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30410 · Cited by 1,012
Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., & Kulkarni, S. R. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/340586 · Cited by 645
An Accretion Model for Anomalous X‐Ray Pulsars
Chatterjee, P., Hernquist, L., & Narayan, R. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308748 · Cited by 303
Magnetar-like X-ray bursts from an anomalous X-ray pulsar
Gavriil, F. P., Kaspi, V. M., & Woods, P. M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01011 · Cited by 235
Self-citationAn Accretion Model for Anomalous X-Ray PulsarsPreprint
Chatterjee, P., Hernquist, L., & Narayan, R. (1999) · Cited by 233
Precision Timing of Two Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars
Kaspi, V. M., Chakrabarty, D., & Steinberger, J. K. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312330 · Cited by 105
Self-citationThe anomalous X–ray pulsar 1E 1048.1–5937: Phase resolved spectroscopy with the XMM-Newton satellite
Tiengo, A., Göhler, E., Staubert, R., & Mereghetti, S. (2002) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011718 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Physics of strongly magnetized neutron stars
Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. (2006) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/r03 · Cited by 823
The strongest cosmic magnets: soft gamma-ray repeaters and anomalous X-ray pulsars
Mereghetti, S. (2008) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-008-0011-z · Cited by 673
Magnetars: the physics behind observations. A review
Turolla, R., Zane, S., & Watts, A. L. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/116901 · Cited by 447
The Gemini Near‐Infrared Imager (NIRI)
Hodapp, K. W., Jensen, J. B., Irwin, E. M., Yamada, H., Chung, R., Fletcher, K., Robertson, L., Hora, J. L., Simons, D. A., Mays, W., et al. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/379669 · Cited by 295
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaspi, V. M., Gavriil, F. P., Woods, P. M., Jensen, J. B., Roberts, M. S. E., & Chakrabarty, D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-04-11
- Volume
- 588
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L93-L96
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2603828070
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Major Soft Gamma Repeater-like Outburst and Rotation Glitch in the No-longer-so-anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 2259+586. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/375683
- The paper
- Kaspi, V. M., Gavriil, F. P., Woods, P. M., Jensen, J. B., Roberts, M. S. E., & Chakrabarty, D. (2003). A Major Soft Gamma Repeater-like Outburst and Rotation Glitch in the No-longer-so-anomalous X-Ray Pulsar 1E 2259+586. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/375683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.