Cited by 94Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

Metal Abundances and Kinematics of Bright Metal-poor Giants Selected from the LSE Survey: Implications for the Metal-weak Thick Disk

Open access
Beers, Timothy C., Drilling, John S., Rossi, Silvia, Chiba, Masashi, Rhee, Jaehyon, Führmeister, Birgit, Norris, John E., von Hippel, Ted·2002·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We report medium-resolution (1–2 Å) spectroscopy and broadband ( UBV ) photometry for a sample of 39 bright stars (the majority of which are likely to be giants) selected as metal-deficient candidates from an objective-prism survey concentrating on Galactic latitudes below | b | = 30°, the Luminous Stars Extension (LSE) survey of Drilling & Bergeron. Although the primary purpose of the LSE survey was to select OB stars (hence the concentration on low latitudes), the small number of bright metal-deficient giant candidates noted during this survey provide interesting information on the metal-weak thick disk (MWTD) population. Metal abundance estimates are obtained from several different techniques and calibrations, including some that make use of the available photometry and spectroscopy and others that use only the spectroscopy; these methods produce abundance estimates that are consistent with one another and should be secure. All of the targets in our study have available high-quality proper motions from the Hipparcos or Tycho II catalogs, or both, that we combine with radial velocities from our spectroscopy to obtain full space motions for the entire sample. The rotational ( V ϕ ) velocities of the LSE giants indicate the presence of a rapidly rotating population, even at quite low metallicity. We consider the distribution of orbital eccentricity of the LSE giants as a function of [Fe/H] and conclude that the local fraction (i.e., within 1 kpc from the Sun) of metal-poor stars that might be associated with the MWTD is on the order of 30%–40% at abundances below [Fe/H] = -1.0. Contrary to recent analyses of previous (much larger) samples of nonkinematically selected metal-poor stars (assembled primarily from prism surveys that concentrated on latitudes above | b | = 30°), we find that this relatively high fraction of local metal-poor stars associated with the MWTD may extend to metallicities below [Fe/H] = -1.6, much lower than had been considered before. We identify a subsample of 11 LSE stars that are very likely to be members of the MWTD, based on their derived kinematics; the lowest metallicity among these stars is [Fe/H] = -2.35. Implications of these results for the origin of the MWTD and for the formation of the Galaxy are considered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/341377

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The thick disk has a significant metal-weak tail, often referred to as the metal-weak thick disk.

    “It also has a very significant tail, which is often referred to as the metalweak thick disk (Norris et al. 1985, Morrison et al. 1990, Morrison 1993, Beers et al. 2002).”

    From Streams, Substructures, and the Early History of the Milky Way (2020) · cites this paper as Beers et al. 2002

    The Summary and Discussion reports evidence for a significant population of metal-poor stars with disklike kinematics. But §2.1 says it remains unclear whether the metal-weak thick disk is the thick disk’s metal-weak tail or a separate population, so the claim states that relationship more firmly than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Chiba, M., Yoshii, Y., & Beers, T. C. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 165, The Third Stromlo Symposium: The Galactic Halo, ed. B. K. Gibson, T. S. Axelrod, & M. E. Putman (San Francisco: ASP), 273
  2. Dinescu, D. I. 2002, in ASP Conf. Ser. 265, Omega Centauri: A Unique Window into Astrophysics, ed. F. van Leeuwen, G. Piotto, & J. Hughes (San Francisco: ASP), in press Drilling, J. S., & Bergeron, L. E. 1995, PASP, 107, 846
  3. Houk, N., & Swift, C. 1999, Michigan Catalog of Two-dimensional Spec- tral Types for the HD Stars, Vol. 5 (Ann Arbor: Univ. Michigan)
  4. Johnson, H. L. 1963, in Basic Astronomical Data, ed. K. A. Strand (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press), 204
  5. Wyse, R. F. G. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 230, Galaxy Disks and Disk Gal- axies, ed. J. G. Funes & E. M. Corsini (San Francisco: ASP), 71

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beers, T. C., Drilling, J. S., Rossi, S., Chiba, M., Rhee, J., Führmeister, B., Norris, J. E., & von Hippel, T.
Affiliations
  • U.S. National Science Foundation (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (JP)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2002-08
Volume
124
Issue
2
Pages
931-948
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2047228913
Cited by
94
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
metal-poor giants, metallicity, stellar kinematics, space motions, rotational speed, orbital eccentricity, metallicity distribution, galactic disk formation, galactic origin, metal-poor stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review