Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 754

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐Organization of Vegetation in Arid Ecosystems

Open access
Rietkerk, Max, Boerlijst, Maarten C., van Langevelde, Frank, HilleRisLambers, Reinier, de Koppel, Johan van, Kumar, Lalit, Prins, Herbert H. T., de Roos, André M.·2002·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Scientists are still searching for possible unifying mechanisms \nto explain this range of spatial patterns (Tongway \nand Ludwig 2001), and an important question of this research \nis whether this range is the result of preexisting \nenvironmental heterogeneity, the result of spatial selforganization, \nor both (Klausmeier 1999; Couteron and \nLejeune 2001; HilleRisLambers et al. 2001; Von Hardenberg \net al. 2001). Here, we contribute to the ongoing debate \nabout vegetation pattern formation in arid ecosystems \nby presenting novel, spatially explicit model analyses and \nresults, extending on the work of HilleRisLambers et al. \n(2001). Our results show that these different vegetation \npatterns observed in arid ecosystems might all be the result \nof spatial self-organization, caused by one single mechanism: \nwater infiltrates faster into vegetated ground than \ninto bare soil, leading to net displacement of surface water \nto vegetated patches. This model differs from earlier model \nresults (Klausmeier 1999; Couteron and Lejeune 2001; \nHilleRisLambers et al. 2001; Von Hardenberg et al. 2001) primarily in two ways: it is fully mechanistic, and it treats \nthe lateral flow of water above and below the soil as separate, \nnot independent, variables. Although the current \nmodel greatly simplifies the biophysics of arid systems, it \ncan reproduce the whole range of distinctive vegetation \npatterns as observed in arid ecosystems, indicating that \nthe proposed mechanism might be generally applicable. \nWe further show that self-organized vegetation patterns \ncan persist far into regions of high aridity, where plants \nwould become extinct if homogeneously distributed, \npointing to the importance of this mechanism for maintaining \nproductivity of arid ecosystems (Noy-Meir 1973). \nOur analyses are based on the model first developed in \nHilleRisLambers et al. (2001)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/342078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 754

Metadata

Authors
Rietkerk, M., Boerlijst, M. C., van Langevelde, F., HilleRisLambers, R., de Koppel, J. V., Kumar, L., Prins, H. H. T., & de Roos, A. M.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
2002-10
Volume
160
Issue
4
Pages
524-530
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2122621577
Cited by
754
References
2
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐Organization of Vegetation in Arid Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/342078
The paper
Rietkerk, M., Boerlijst, M. C., van Langevelde, F., HilleRisLambers, R., de Koppel, J. V., Kumar, L., Prins, H. H. T., & de Roos, A. M. (2002). Self‐Organization of Vegetation in Arid Ecosystems. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/342078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.