Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 185

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Constraints on Ωmand σ8from Weak Lensing in Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey Fields

Open access
Hoekstra, Henk, Yee, Howard K. C., Gladders, Michael D.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We have analyzed 53 deg 2 of R C -band imaging data from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) and measured the excess correlations in the shapes of galaxies on scales out to ~1 5. We separate the signal into an "E" (lensing) and "B" (systematics) mode, which allows us to study the contribution from residual systematics and intrinsic alignments. On scales larger than 10', we find no B mode, suggesting that the signal at those scales is caused solely by gravitational lensing. On smaller scales we find a small but significant B mode. This signal is also present when we select a sample of bright (20 < R C < 22) galaxies. These galaxies are rather insensitive to observational distortions, and we therefore conclude that the observed B mode is likely to be caused by intrinsic alignments. To minimize the effect of intrinsic alignments, we limit the cosmic shear analysis to galaxies with 22 < R C < 24. We derive joint constraints on Ω m and σ 8 by marginalizing over Γ, Ω Λ , and the source redshift distribution, using different priors. Marginalizing over Γ and Ω Λ , and using a flat prior for the source redshift distribution, yields a conservative constraint of σ 8 = 0.45 Ω (95% confidence). A better constraint is derived when we use Gaussian priors for Γ (from the Two-Degree Field survey) and Ω m + Ω Λ (from cosmic microwave background [CMB]), and the source redshift distribution. For this choice of priors, we find σ 8 = (0.46 )Ω (95% confidence). We also investigated whether the RCS data can be used to constrain Γ. Using our set of Gaussian priors, we find that we can only place a lower bound on Γ for which we find Γ > 0.1 + 0.16Ω m (95% confidence). Comparison of the RCS results with three other recent cosmic shear measurements shows excellent agreement. The current weak-lensing results are also in good agreement with CMB measurements, when we allow the reionization optical depth τ and the spectral index n s to vary. We present a simple demonstration of how the weak-lensing results can be used as a prior in the parameter estimation from CMB measurements to derive constraints on the reionization optical depth τ.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/342120

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 185

Metadata

Authors
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-10
Volume
577
Issue
2
Pages
595-603
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2113596630
Cited by
185
References
0
FWCI
18.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints on Ωmand σ8from Weak Lensing in Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/342120
The paper
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D. (2002). Constraints on Ωmand σ8from Weak Lensing in Red‐Sequence Cluster Survey Fields. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/342120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.