The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations
Open accessAbstract
The Shear Testing Programme (STEP) is a collaborative project to improve the accuracy and reliability of all weak lensing measurements in preparation for the next generation of wide-field surveys. In this first STEP paper, we present the results of a blind analysis of simulated ground-based observations of relatively simple galaxy morphologies. The most successful methods are shown to achieve percent level accuracy. From the cosmic shear pipelines that have been used to constrain cosmology, we find weak lensing shear measured to an accuracy that is within the statistical errors of current weak lensing analyses, with shear measurements accurate to better than 7 per cent. The dominant source of measurement error is shown to arise from calibration uncertainties where the measured shear is over or underestimated by a constant multiplicative factor. This is of concern as calibration errors cannot be detected through standard diagnostic tests. The measured calibration errors appear to result from stellar contamination, false object detection, the shear measurement method itself, selection bias and/or the use of biased weights. Additive systematics (false detections of shear) resulting from residual point-spread function anisotropy are, in most cases, reduced to below an equivalent shear of 0.001, an order of magnitude below cosmic shear distortions on the scales probed by current surveys. Our results provide a snapshot view of the accuracy of current ground-based weak lensing methods and a benchmark upon which we can improve. To this end we provide descriptions of each method tested and include details of the eight different implementations of the commonly used Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst method (KSB+) to aid the improvement of future KSB+ analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SExtractor: Software for source extraction
Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. (1996) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series · doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 · Cited by 10,866
Self-citationBartelmann, M., & Schneider, P. (2001) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00082-x · Cited by 2,420
A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
Kaiser, N., Squires, G., & Broadhurst, T. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176071 · Cited by 789
Clowe, D., Gonzalez, A., & Markevitch, M. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/381970 · Cited by 638
Self-citationDetection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Self-citationShapes and Shears, Stars and Smears: Optimal Measurements for Weak Lensing
Bernstein, G. M., & Jarvis, M. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/338085 · Cited by 523
Self-citationCross-Correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing
Jain, B., & Taylor, A. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.141302 · Cited by 498
Systematic errors in future weak-lensing surveys: requirements and prospects for self-calibration
Huterer, D., Takada, M., Bernstein, G., & Jain, B. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09782.x · Cited by 409 · cited 1×
“…errors, it can only be directly detected through the cosmic shear analysis of image simulations, although see the discussion on self-calibration in Huterer et al. (2006) and Hirata et al. (2004) and Mandelbaum et al. (2005) for model-dependent estimates of shear calibration errors in the Sloan…”
BackgroundSelf-citationShear calibration biases in weak-lensing surveys
Hirata, C., & Seljak, U. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06683.x · Cited by 395
Properties of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos from Weak Lensing
Hoekstra, H., Yee, H. K. C., & Gladders, M. D. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/382726 · Cited by 348
Self-citation
Cited by
KiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
Self-citationCosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration
Amon, A., Gruen, D., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Dodelson, S., Choi, A., Doux, C., Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023514 · Cited by 437
Self-citationWeak Lensing for Precision Cosmology
Mandelbaum, R. (2018) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051928 · Cited by 409
LoCuSS: Subaru Weak Lensing Study of 30 Galaxy Clusters
Okabe, N., Takada, M., Umetsu, K., Futamase, T., & Smith, G. P. (2010) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan · doi:10.1093/pasj/62.3.811 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Bacon, D., Berge, J., Bernstein, G., Bertin, E., Bridle, S., Brown, M. L., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., Erben, T., Gray, M., Hetterscheidt, M., Hoekstra, H., Hudelot, P., Jarvis, M., Kuijken, K., Margoniner, V., Massey, R., Mellier, Y., Nakajima, R., Refregier, A., Rhodes, J., Schrabback, T., & Wittman, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-13
- Volume
- 368
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1323-1339
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2098596607
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x
- The paper
- Heymans, C., Van Waerbeke, L., Bacon, D., Berge, J., Bernstein, G., Bertin, E., Bridle, S., Brown, M. L., Clowe, D., Dahle, H., Erben, T., Gray, M., Hetterscheidt, M., Hoekstra, H., Hudelot, P., Jarvis, M., Kuijken, K., Margoniner, V., Massey, R., . . . Wittman, D. (2006). The Shear Testing Programme – I. Weak lensing analysis of simulated ground-based observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10198.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.