Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms

Open access
Norris, J. P.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Spectral lags (τ lag ) are deduced using a cross-correlation methodology for 1429 long ( T 90 > 2 s) BATSE gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with peak flux F p > 0.25 photons cm -2 s -1 , near to the BATSE trigger threshold. The lags are modeled as a power-law function of peak flux with limit parameters for the lag extrema. Lag model errors are assigned via a novel decimation procedure, drawing from the observed lag distribution with F p and τ lag as governing parameters. The model parameters were adjusted within a five-dimensional grid to achieve best agreement with the observed distribution in the F p -τ lag plane. Assuming a two-branch lag-luminosity relationship, the lags are self-consistently corrected for cosmological effects to yield distributions in luminosity, distance, and redshift. The results have several consequences for GRB populations and for unified gamma-ray/afterglow scenarios that would account for afterglow break times and gamma-ray spectral evolution in terms of jet opening angle, viewing angle, or a profiled jet with variable Lorentz factor. A component of the burst sample is identified—those with few, wide pulses, lags of a few tenths to several seconds, and soft spectra—whose log N - log F p distribution approximates a -3/2 power law, suggesting homogeneity and relatively nearby sources. The proportion of long-lag bursts increases from negligible among bright BATSE bursts to ~50% at trigger threshold. Bursts with very long lags, ~1-2 s < τ lag < 10 s, show a tendency to concentrate near the supergalactic plane with a quadrupole moment of roughly -0.10 ± 0.04. GRB 980425 (SN 1998bw) is a member of this subsample of ~90 bursts with estimated distances less than 100 Mpc. The frequency of the observed ultralow-luminosity bursts is ~ that of Type Ib/c supernovae (SNe Ib/c) within the same volume. The model lags predict a power-law scaling relation for the ultralow-luminosity GRBs, dN sen / dL ~ L -1 , flatter than expected ( dN sen / dL ~ L 1/6 ) if viewing angle with respect to the jet axis alone governed perceived luminosity. For high-luminosity bursts, the modeling yields dN vol / dL ~ L -1.8 , similar to expectations for viewing angle scenarios ( dN vol / dL ~ L -2 ); however, if luminosity decreases off-axis, L ~ θ (λ > 0), then overproduction of low-luminosity bursts results. Thus, the relativistic kinematic factor as the dominant component for the dynamic range in GRB luminosities is not favored. The variable beaming fraction scenario, with constant luminosity across the jet cone, can fit the high-luminosity bursts with a fairly flat distribution in jet cone solid angle, dN (Ω jet )/ d Ω jet ∝ Ω ; for the ultralow-luminosity bursts a distribution that increases is required, dN (Ω jet )/ d Ω jet ∝ Ω . Jets with variable luminosity profiles viewed at a range of angles can also reproduce the observed luminosity distributions, such that L ~ θ and L ~ θ for high- and ultralow-luminosity regimes, respectively. Approximately 1/300 of the universal SN Ib/c population would be required to produce GRBs at cosmological distances, with a rate of 1 × 10 6 to a few times 10 6 yr -1 . The modeled redshift distribution for GRBs peaks at z ~ 10, with large uncertainty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/342747

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Norris, J. P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-11
Volume
579
Issue
1
Pages
386-403
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2062222996
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/342747
The paper
Norris, J. P. (2002). Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/342747

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.