The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms
Open accessAbstract
Spectral lags (τ lag ) are deduced using a cross-correlation methodology for 1429 long ( T 90 > 2 s) BATSE gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) with peak flux F p > 0.25 photons cm -2 s -1 , near to the BATSE trigger threshold. The lags are modeled as a power-law function of peak flux with limit parameters for the lag extrema. Lag model errors are assigned via a novel decimation procedure, drawing from the observed lag distribution with F p and τ lag as governing parameters. The model parameters were adjusted within a five-dimensional grid to achieve best agreement with the observed distribution in the F p -τ lag plane. Assuming a two-branch lag-luminosity relationship, the lags are self-consistently corrected for cosmological effects to yield distributions in luminosity, distance, and redshift. The results have several consequences for GRB populations and for unified gamma-ray/afterglow scenarios that would account for afterglow break times and gamma-ray spectral evolution in terms of jet opening angle, viewing angle, or a profiled jet with variable Lorentz factor. A component of the burst sample is identified—those with few, wide pulses, lags of a few tenths to several seconds, and soft spectra—whose log N - log F p distribution approximates a -3/2 power law, suggesting homogeneity and relatively nearby sources. The proportion of long-lag bursts increases from negligible among bright BATSE bursts to ~50% at trigger threshold. Bursts with very long lags, ~1-2 s < τ lag < 10 s, show a tendency to concentrate near the supergalactic plane with a quadrupole moment of roughly -0.10 ± 0.04. GRB 980425 (SN 1998bw) is a member of this subsample of ~90 bursts with estimated distances less than 100 Mpc. The frequency of the observed ultralow-luminosity bursts is ~ that of Type Ib/c supernovae (SNe Ib/c) within the same volume. The model lags predict a power-law scaling relation for the ultralow-luminosity GRBs, dN sen / dL ~ L -1 , flatter than expected ( dN sen / dL ~ L 1/6 ) if viewing angle with respect to the jet axis alone governed perceived luminosity. For high-luminosity bursts, the modeling yields dN vol / dL ~ L -1.8 , similar to expectations for viewing angle scenarios ( dN vol / dL ~ L -2 ); however, if luminosity decreases off-axis, L ~ θ (λ > 0), then overproduction of low-luminosity bursts results. Thus, the relativistic kinematic factor as the dominant component for the dynamic range in GRB luminosities is not favored. The variable beaming fraction scenario, with constant luminosity across the jet cone, can fit the high-luminosity bursts with a fairly flat distribution in jet cone solid angle, dN (Ω jet )/ d Ω jet ∝ Ω ; for the ultralow-luminosity bursts a distribution that increases is required, dN (Ω jet )/ d Ω jet ∝ Ω . Jets with variable luminosity profiles viewed at a range of angles can also reproduce the observed luminosity distributions, such that L ~ θ and L ~ θ for high- and ultralow-luminosity regimes, respectively. Approximately 1/300 of the universal SN Ib/c population would be required to produce GRBs at cosmological distances, with a rate of 1 × 10 6 to a few times 10 6 yr -1 . The modeled redshift distribution for GRBs peaks at z ~ 10, with large uncertainty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
A new γ-ray burst classification scheme from GRB 060614
Gehrels, N., Norris, J. P., Barthelmy, S. D., Granot, J., Kaneko, Y., Kouveliotou, C., Markwardt, C. B., Mészáros, P., Nakar, E., Nousek, J. A., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05376 · Cited by 555
Self-citationGamma‐Ray Burst Energetics and the Gamma‐Ray Burst Hubble Diagram: Promises and Limitations
Bloom, J. S., Frail, D. A., & Kulkarni, S. R. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377125 · Cited by 395
Liang, E., Zhang, B., Virgili, F., & Dai, Z. G. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/517959 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Norris, J. P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 579
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 386-403
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2062222996
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/342747
- The paper
- Norris, J. P. (2002). Implications of the Lag‐Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma‐Ray Burst Paradigms. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/342747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.