The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Analysis of Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectral Break Models
Open accessAbstract
Typical γ-ray burst (GRB) spectra are characterized by a spectral break E p , which for bright BATSE bursts is found to be narrowly clustered around 300 keV. Recently identified X-ray flashes, which may account for a significant portion of the whole GRB population, seem to extend the E p distribution to a broader range below 40 keV. Positive correlations among E p and some other observed parameters have been noticed. On the other hand, within the cosmological fireball model, the issues concerning the dominant energy ingredient of the fireball as well as the location of the GRB emission site are still unsettled, leading to several variants of the fireball model. Here we analyze these models within a unified framework and critically reexamine the E p predictions in the various model variants. Attention is focused on the predictions of the narrowness of the E p distribution in different models and the correlations among E p and other measurable observables. These model properties can be tested against the current and upcoming GRB data, through which the nature of the fireball as well as the mechanism and site of the GRB emission will be identified. In view of the current data, various models are appraised through a simple Monte Carlo simulation, and a tentative discussion about the possible nature of X-ray flashes is presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
“Such an injection also happens if the central engine further ejects highshells that catch up with the decelerating blast wave (Zhang & Mészáros 2002a).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBright X-ray Flares in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows
Burrows, D. N., Romano, P., Falcone, A., Kobayashi, S., Zhang, B., Moretti, A., O'Brien, P. T., Goad, M. R., Campana, S., Page, K. L., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116168 · Cited by 543
Self-citationDissipative Photosphere Models of Gamma‐Ray Bursts and X‐Ray Flashes
Rees, M. J., & Meszaros, P. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/430818 · Cited by 481
Self-citationSwift Observations of GRB 070110: An Extraordinary X‐Ray Afterglow Powered by the Central Engine
Troja, E., Cusumano, G., O’Brien, P. T., Zhang, B., Sbarufatti, B., Mangano, V., Willingale, R., Chincarini, G., Osborne, J. P., Marshall, F. E., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/519450 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, B., & Meszaros, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-12-20
- Volume
- 581
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1236-1247
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2145669317
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Analysis of Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectral Break Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/344338
- The paper
- Zhang, B., & Meszaros, P. (2002). An Analysis of Gamma‐Ray Burst Spectral Break Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/344338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.