The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?
Abstract
The striking growth in the trade share of output is one of the most important developments in the world economy since World War II. Two features of this growth present challenges to the standard trade models. First, the growth is generally thought to have been generated by falling tariff barriers worldwide. But tariff barriers have decreased by only about 11 percentage points since the early 1960s; the standard models cannot explain the growth of trade without assuming counterfactually large elasticities of substitution between goods. Second, tariff declines were much larger prior to the mid 1980s than after, and yet, trade growth was smaller in the earlier period than in the later period. The standard models have difficulty generating this nonlinear feature. This paper develops a two‐country dynamic Ricardian trade model that offers a resolution of these two puzzles. The key idea embedded in this model is vertical specialization, which occurs when countries specialize only in particular stages of a good’s production sequence. The model generates a nonlinear trade response to tariff reductions and can explain over 50 percent of the growth of trade. Finally, the model has important implications for the gains from trade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage 1
Balassa, B. (1965) · The Manchester School · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x · Cited by 4,809
Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation
Balassa, B. (1965) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/259085 · Cited by 337
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Backus David K, 1994, A.E.R., 84, 84
- 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00060-X · DOI · Paper page
- Bajona Claustre, 2000, Manuscript.
- Balassa Bela A, 1967, Trade Liberalization among Industrial Countries: Objectives and Alternatives
- 10.1111/j.1467-9957.1977.tb00701.x · DOI
- 10.1086/261837 · DOI
- Bergoeing Raphael, 2001, Staff Report no. 284.
- 10.2307/2109853 · DOI
- Cline William R, 1978, Washington: Brookings Inst.
- 10.1016/S0304-3932(96)01298-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01383-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2139/ssrn.113028 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.113028
- 10.3998/mpub.9690070 · doi:10.3998/mpub.9690070
- Dornbusch Fischer, 1977, A.E.R., 67, 823
- 10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · DOI · Paper page
- El‐Agraa Ali M, 1994, The Economics of the European Community
- Evenett Simon J, 1998, Willingness to Pay for Tariff Liberalization
- Evenett Simon J, 1999, Decomposing the Growth of OECD Trade during 1970–96
- 10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00115-1 · doi:10.1016/s0304-3878(98)00115-1
- Feenstra Robert C, 1996, NBER Trade Database, disk 1. Working Paper no. 5515
- Feenstra Robert C, 1997, NBER Trade Database, disk 3. Working Paper no. 5990
- 10.1086/260725 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9396.00217 · DOI
- Harrigan James, 1997, Research Paper no. 9734.
- Harrigan James, 1997, A.E.R., 87, 475
- 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00011-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Hummels David, 1999, Manuscript.
- 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00093-3 · DOI · Paper page
- Hummels Rapoport, 1998, Fed. Reserve Bank New York Econ. Policy Rev., 4, 79
- 10.1017/CBO9780511759314.006 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511759314.006
- Ishii Jun, 1997, Research Paper no. 9718.
- Jones Ronald W, 1997, Manuscript. Rochester
- Jorgenson Gollop, 1987, Mass.: Harvard Univ
- 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90030-X · DOI · Paper page
- Kouparitsas Michael A, 1997, Manuscript.
- Krugman Paul, 1980, A.E.R., 70, 950
- Maddison Angus, 1991, Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development: A Long‐Run Comparative View
- 10.2307/2118477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0022050700015539 · DOI · Paper page
- Preeg Ernest H, 1970, Washington: Brookings Inst.
- 10.1111/1467-9396.00229 · DOI
- 10.2307/135631 · doi:10.2307/135631
- Schott Jeffrey J, 1994, Washington: Inst. Internat. Econ.
- Development, 1968, The Kennedy Round Estimated Effects on Tariff Barriers
- Development, Handbook of International Trade and Development Statistics
- U.S. Council of Economic Advisers., 2001, Washington: Council Econ. Advisers
- Whalley John, 1985, Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas
- World Trade Organization, 2000, International Trade Statistics
- 10.2307/2526918 · doi:10.2307/2526918
Cited by
Technology, Geography, and Trade
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · Cited by 4,485
Globalization and the Gains From Variety
Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541 · Cited by 2,478
Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2004) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/0022051042177649 · Cited by 2,524
Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring
Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.1978 · Cited by 2,262
Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added
Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003 · Cited by 1,769
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 52-102
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W3122817164
- Cited by
- 1,304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 101.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/344805
- The paper
- Yi, K. (2003). Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/344805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.