The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Our Sun. V. A Bright Young Sun Consistent with Helioseismology and Warm Temperatures on Ancient Earth and Mars
Open accessAbstract
The relatively warm temperatures required on early Earth and Mars have been difficult to account for via warming from greenhouse gases. We tested whether this problem can be resolved for both Earth and Mars by a young Sun that is brighter than predicted by the standard solar model (SSM). We computed high-precision solar evolutionary models with slightly increased initial masses of M i = 1.01-1.07 M ☉ ; for each mass, we considered three different mass-loss scenarios. We then tested whether these models were consistent with the current high-precision helioseismic observations. The relatively modest mass-loss rates in these models are consistent with observational limits from young stars and estimates of the past solar wind obtained from lunar rocks and do not significantly affect the solar lithium depletion. For appropriate initial masses, all three mass-loss scenarios are capable of yielding a solar flux 3.8 Gyr ago high enough to be consistent with water on ancient Mars. The higher flux at the planets is due partly to the fact that a more massive young Sun would be intrinsically more luminous and partly to the fact that the planets would be closer to the more massive young Sun. At birth on the main sequence, our preferred initial mass M i = 1.07 M ☉ would produce a solar flux at the planets 50% higher than that of the SSM, namely, a flux 5% higher than the present value (rather than 30% lower, which the SSM predicts). At first (for 1-2 Gyr), the solar flux would decrease ; subsequently, it would behave more like the flux in the SSM, increasing until the present. We find that all of our mass-losing solar models are consistent with the helioseismic observations; in fact, our preferred mass-losing case with M i = 1.07 M ☉ is in marginally (although insignificantly) better agreement with the helioseismology than is the SSM. The early solar mass loss of a few percent does indeed leave a small fingerprint on the Sun's internal structure. However, for helioseismology to significantly constrain early solar mass loss would require higher accuracy in the observed solar parameters and input physics, namely, by a factor of ~3 for the observed solar surface composition and a factor of ~2 for the solar interior opacities, the p - p nuclear reaction rate, and the diffusion constants for gravitational settling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“One solution to the FYS is that the young Sun was not faint but more massive and therefore as bright as today (205, 206).”
From The Archean atmosphere (2020) · cites this paper as [206]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Luminosity function and stellar evolution
Salpeter, E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 6,816
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042
Iglesias, C. A., & Rogers, F. J. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177381 · Cited by 3,037
Habitable Zones around Main Sequence Stars
Kasting, J. F., Whitmire, D. P., & Reynolds, R. T. (1993) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1010 · Cited by 2,501 · cited 1×
“According to Kasting (1991) and Kasting et al. (1993), this requires a solar flux (at Mars) 3.8 Gyr ago at least 13% larger than that from the standard solar model, in order to make it possible for a CO2 greenhouse effect on Mars to be able raise the temperature to 0◦C.”
BackgroundInfluentialGrevesse, N., & Sauval, A. (1998) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1023/a:1005161325181 · Cited by 2,412
A negative feedback mechanism for the long‐term stabilization of Earth's surface temperature
Walker, J. C. G., Hays, P. B., & Kasting, J. F. (1981) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/jc086ic10p09776 · Cited by 2,310
A compilation of charged-particle induced thermonuclear reaction rates
Angulo, C., Arnould, M., Rayet, M., Descouvemont, P., Baye, D., Leclercq-Willain, C., Coc, A., Barhoumi, S., Aguer, P., Rolfs, C., et al. (1999) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(99)00030-5 · Cited by 1,438
Evidence for life on Earth before 3,800 million years ago
Mojzsis, S. J., Arrhenius, G., McKeegan, K. D., Harrison, T. M., Nutman, A. P., & Friend, C. R. L. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384055a0 · Cited by 1,370
Low-temperature Rosseland opacities
Alexander, D. R., & Ferguson, J. W. (1994) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175039 · Cited by 1,161
Earth and Mars: evolution of atmospheres and surface temperatures
Sagan, C., & Mullen, G. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.177.4043.52 · Cited by 942
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Charbonnel C., 1992, A&A, 255, 191
- Cohen, E. R. & Taylor, B. N. 1986, Codata Bulletin No. 63 (New York: Pergamon)
- Geiss J., 1973, Proc. 13th Int. Cosmic-Ray Conf. (Denver), 5, 3375
- Geiss, J. & Bochsler, P. 1991, in The Sun in Time, ed. C. Sonnett, M. Giampapa, & M. Matthews (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 98
- Grevesse, N. & Noels, A. 1993, in Origin and Evolution of the Elements, ed. N. Prantzos, E. Vangioni-Flam, & M. Casse (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 15
- Kerridge, J. F., Signer, P., Wieler, R., Becker, R. H. & Pepin, R. O. 1991, in The Sun in Time, ed. C. Sonnett, M. Giampapa, & M. Matthews (Tucson: Univ. Arizona Press), 389
- Lebreton Y., 1987, A&A, 175, 99
- Morel P., 1997, A&A, 327, 349
- Murphy W. M., 1998, BAAS, 30, 03
- Richard O., 1996, A&A, 312, 1000
- Schatzman E., 1977, A&A, 56, 211
- Willson L. A., 1987, Comments Astrophys., 12, 17
- Woese C., 1987, Microbiol. Rev., 51, 221, 10.1128/MMBR.51.2.221-271.1987 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–113 of 113
The Prebiotic Atmosphere of the Earth
Selsis, F. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-2305-7_11 · Cited by 4
Güdel, M. (2015) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_1700 · Cited by 4
Solar models with protosolar accretion and turbulent mixing
Kunitomo, M., Buldgen, G., & Guillot, T. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555104 · Cited by 3
The empirical upper limit for mass loss of cool main sequence stars
Lednicka, A., & Stȩpień, K. (2008) · Astronomische Nachrichten · doi:10.1002/asna.200710968 · Cited by 3
Advances in Space Meteorology Modeling and Predicting - the Key Factor of Life Evolution
Messerotti, M. (2006) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-4968-2_16 · Cited by 2
Lang, K. R. (2009) · Astronomy and astrophysics library · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76953-8_9 · Cited by 2
Güdel, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union · doi:10.1017/s174392130999295x
Lang, K. R. (2013) · Undergraduate lecture notes in physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35963-7_16
Tian, F., Güdel, M., Johnstone, C. P., Lammer, H., Luger, R., & Odert, P. (2018) · Space sciences series of ISSI · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1628-2_12
Güdel, M. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_1700-5
The Solar Wind and The Sun in the Past
Wood, B. E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70943-7_1
Güdel, M. (2023) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65093-6_1700
Marin‐Carbonne, J. (2009) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4efdd713z774az4957z82f9z13680ca65b10
Metadata
- Authors
- Sackmann, I. ‐., & Boothroyd, A. I.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 583
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1024-1039
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2130229226
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Astro and Planetary Science
- Keywords
- young Sun, solar luminosity, solar mass loss, helioseismology, global warming, solar wind, lunar rocks, solar opacity, gravitational settling, water on Mars
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review