Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts

Open access
Labbé, Ivo, Franx, Marijn, Rudnick, Gregory, Schreiber, Natascha M. Förster, Rix, Hans-Walter, Moorwood, Alan, van Dokkum, Pieter G., van der Werf, Paul, Röttgering, Huub, van Starkenburg, Lottie, van de Wel, Arjen, Kuijken, Konrad, Daddi, Emanuele·2003·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We present deep near-infrared (NIR) J s -, H -, and K s -band ISAAC imaging of the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) field of the Hubble Deep Field South (HDF-S). The 2 5 × 2 5 high Galactic latitude field was observed with the Very Large Telescope under the best seeing conditions, with integration times amounting to 33.6 hr in J s , 32.3 hr in H , and 35.6 hr in K s . We reach total AB magnitudes for point sources of 26.8, 26.2, and 26.2, respectively (3 σ), which make it the deepest ground-based NIR observation to date and the deepest K s -band data in any field. The effective seeing of the co-added images is ≈0 45 in J s , ≈0 48 in H , and ≈0 46 in K s . Using published WFPC2 optical data, we constructed a K s -limited multicolor catalog containing 833 sources down to K ≲ 26, of which 624 have seven-band optical-to-NIR photometry. These data allow us to select normal galaxies from their rest-frame optical properties to high redshift ( z ≲ 4). The observations, data reduction, and properties of the final images are discussed, and we address the detection and photometry procedures that were used in making the catalog. In addition, we present deep number counts, color distributions, and photometric redshifts of the HDF-S galaxies. We find that our faint K s -band number counts are flatter than published counts in other deep fields, which might reflect cosmic variations or different analysis techniques. Compared to the HDF-N, we find many galaxies with very red V - H colors at photometric redshifts 1.95 < z phot < 3.5. These galaxies are bright in K s , with infrared colors redder than J s - K s > 2.3 (in Johnson magnitudes). Because they are extremely faint in the observed optical, they would be missed by ultraviolet–optical selection techniques, such as the U -dropout method.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/346140

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Labbé, I., Franx, M., Rudnick, G., Schreiber, N. M. F., Rix, H.-W., Moorwood, A., van Dokkum, P. G., van der Werf, P., Röttgering, H., van Starkenburg, L., van de Wel, A., Kuijken, K., & Daddi, E.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2003-03
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
1107-1123
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W1964084977
Cited by
261
References
1
FWCI
16.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/346140
The paper
Labbé, I., Franx, M., Rudnick, G., Schreiber, N. M. F., Rix, H.-W., Moorwood, A., van Dokkum, P. G., van der Werf, P., Röttgering, H., van Starkenburg, L., van de Wel, A., Kuijken, K., & Daddi, E. (2003). Ultradeep Near-Infrared ISAAC Observations of the Hubble Deep Field South: Observations, Reduction, Multicolor Catalog, and Photometric Redshifts. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/346140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.