The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness
Open accessAbstract
A series of studies demonstrates that consumers are inclined to believe that the selling price of a good or service is substantially higher than its fair price. Consumers appear sensitive to several reference points—including past prices, competitor prices, and cost of goods sold—but underestimate the effects of inflation, overattribute price differences to profit, and fail to take into account the full range of vendor costs. Potential corrective interventions—such as providing historical price information, explaining price differences, and cueing costs—were only modestly effective. These results are considered in the context of a four-dimensional transaction space that illustrates sources of perceived unfairness for both individual and multiple transactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
Fault trees: sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.330 · Cited by 708
Cited by
The price is unfair! A conceptual framework of price fairness perceptions
Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733 · Cited by 1,474
Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions
Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84 · Cited by 848
Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions
Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/508435 · Cited by 520
How do price fairness perceptions differ across culture?
Bolton, L. E., Keh, H. T., & Alba, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.3.564 · Cited by 264
Self-citationGrewal, D., Hardesty, D. M., & Iyer, G. R. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20024 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 474-491
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2170500788
- Cited by
- 1,071
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/346244
- The paper
- Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/346244
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.