The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sympathy and Empathy: Emotional Responses to Advertising Dramas
Abstract
This research examines differences in consumers' sympathy and empathy responses to televised drama commercials. The research framework is multidisciplinary, for construct definition from humanities disciplines (aesthetics and philosophy) grounds the empirical testing of sympathy and empathy responses to advertising. Valid and reliable measurement instruments are developed to test relationships between sympathy and empathy as responses to classical and vignette advertising dramas. Results of two experiments indicate that sympathy responses mediate the effect of a drama advertisement's form on empathy responses, with both sympathy and empathy directly enhancing positive attitudes to an advertisement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 · Cited by 4,861
Cited by
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing
Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20203 · Cited by 641
Hwang, J., & Griffiths, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/jcm-10-2015-1560 · Cited by 288
Effective influencer marketing: A social identity perspective
Farivar, S., & Wang, F. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103026 · Cited by 251
Janson, A. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107954 · Cited by 187
The Mediating Role of Anticipated Guilt in Consumers’ Ethical Decision-Making
Steenhaut, S., & Van Kenhove, P. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9090-9 · Cited by 185
Artificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic?
Seitz, L. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100067 · Cited by 137
Increasing Mental Health Literacy via Narrative Advertising
Chang, C. (2008) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730701807027 · Cited by 113
(Monroe) Meng, L., Kou, S., Duan, S., & Bie, Y. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114874 · Cited by 80
Service robot anthropomorphism on consumer usage intention: curvilinear and linear effect
Yang, M., Li, J., Feng, L., Chen, S.-C., & Tseng, M.-L. (2024) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-08-2023-0538 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 566-578
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2168813198
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 78.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
