The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can the Market Add and Subtract? Mispricing in Tech Stock Carve‐outs
Abstract
Recent equity carve‐outs in U.S. technology stocks appear to violate a basic premise of financial theory: identical assets have identical prices. In our 1998–2000 sample, holders of a share of company A are expected to receive x shares of company B, but the price of A is less than x times the price of B. A prominent example involves 3Com and Palm. Arbitrage does not eliminate this blatant mispricing due to short‐sale constraints, so that B is overpriced but expensive or impossible to sell short. Evidence from options prices shows that shorting costs are extremely high, eliminating exploitable arbitrage opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
FAMA, E. F. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x · Cited by 5,350
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x · Cited by 5,291
Cited by
Investor Sentiment and the Cross‐Section of Stock Returns
BAKER, M., & WURGLER, J. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x · Cited by 6,049
Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing
(2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00379 · Cited by 2,357
Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices
Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.5.2066 · Cited by 1,544
Investor Sentiment and the Cross-section of Stock Returns
Baker, M. P., & Wurgler, J. A. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.464843 · Cited by 1,456
Chapter 18 A survey of behavioral finance
Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. (2003) · Handbook of the Economics of Finance · doi:10.1016/s1574-0102(03)01027-6 · Cited by 1,441
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamont, O. A., & Thaler, R. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-268
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W3123110074
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 57.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
