Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Weak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey

Open access
Jarvis, M., Bernstein, G. M., Fischer, P., Smith, D., Jain, B., Tyson, J. A., Wittman, D.·2003·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We measure seeing-corrected ellipticities for 2 × 10 6 galaxies with magnitude R ≤ 23 in 12 widely separated fields totaling 75 deg 2 of sky. At angular scales ≳30', ellipticity correlations are detected at high significance and exhibit nearly the pure " E mode" behavior expected of weak gravitational lensing. Even when smoothed to the full field size of 2 5, which is ≈25 h -1 Mpc at the lens distances, an rms shear variance of ⟨γ 2 ⟩ 1/2 = 0.0012 ± 0.0003 is detected. At smaller angular scales, there is significant " B -mode" power, an indication of residual uncorrected point-spread function distortions. The data at scales above 30' constrain the power spectrum of matter fluctuations on comoving scales of ≈10 h -1 Mpc to have σ 8 (Ω m /0.3) 0.57 = 0.71 (95% confidence level, ΛCDM, Γ = 0.21), where the systematic error includes statistical and calibration uncertainties, cosmic variance, and a conservative estimate of systematic contamination based upon the detected B -mode signal. This normalization of the power spectrum is lower than, but generally consistent with, previous weak-lensing results, is at the lower end of the σ 8 range from various analyses of galaxy cluster abundances, and agrees with recent determinations from cosmic microwave background and galaxy clustering. The large and dispersed sky coverage of our survey reduces random errors and cosmic variance, while the relatively shallow depth allows us to use existing redshift survey data to reduce systematic uncertainties in the N ( z ) distribution to insignificance. Reanalysis of the data with more sophisticated algorithms will hopefully reduce the systematic ( B mode) contamination and allow more precise, multidimensional constraint of cosmological parameters.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/367799

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Jarvis, M., Bernstein, G. M., Fischer, P., Smith, D., Jain, B., Tyson, J. A., & Wittman, D.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2003-03
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
1014-1032
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2083914518
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
24.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/367799
The paper
Jarvis, M., Bernstein, G. M., Fischer, P., Smith, D., Jain, B., Tyson, J. A., & Wittman, D. (2003). Weak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/367799

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.