Cited by 28Language, Linguistics, Cultural AnalysisPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLinguistics and language evolution

Stress, Vowel Quantity, and Syllable Division in Egyptian

Edgerton, William F.·1947·Journal of Near Eastern Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/370808

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Edgerton, W. F.
Corresponding author
Edgerton, William F.
Venue
Journal of Near Eastern Studies
Published
1947-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-17
ISSN
  • 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6978
OpenAlex
W2026948479
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
Keywords
Egyptian language, stress, vowel quantity, syllable division, phonology, syllable structure, Egyptian phonology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review