Neue Keilschriftliche Umschreibungen ägyptischer Namen aus den Boǧazköytexten
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New Kingdom personal names in cuneiform transmission contain no indication that in phrases, syntagms and sentences univerbated into single words a component other than the last was stressed.
“dem steht immerhin entgegen, daß personennamen des neuen reiches in keilschriftlicher Wiedergabe, 67 die als ältestes direktes Zeugnis der nebenüberlieferung Betonungsverhältnisse in ägyptischen Wörtern bzw.Wortverbindungen erhalten haben, keinen Hinweis dafür enthalten, daß in phrasen, Syntagmen und Sätzen, die zu einzelwörtern univerbiert wurden, ein anderer Bestandteil als der letzte 68 betont”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allen, J. P. (2020) · doi:10.1017/9781108751827 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Gundacker, R. (2021) · Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies · doi:10.37011/lingaeg.29.04 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Edel, E.
- Corresponding author
- Edel, Elmar
- Venue
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1948-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-24
- ISSN
- 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6978
- OpenAlex
- W2055021218
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 21 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Egyptian names, cuneiform inscription, Hittite texts, Hattusa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
