The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of a Structured Relativistic Jet and Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curves
Open accessAbstract
We carry out a numerical hydrodynamical modeling for the evolution of a relativistic collimated outflow as it interacts with the surrounding medium and calculate the light curve resulting from synchrotron emission of the shocked fluid. The hydrodynamic equations are reduced to one-dimensional by assuming axial symmetry and integrating over the radial profile of the flow, thus considerably reducing the computation time. We present results for a number of different initial jet structures, including several different power laws and a Gaussian profile for the dependence of the energy per unit solid angle, , and the Lorentz factor, Γ, on the angle from the jet symmetry axis. Our choice of parameters for the various calculations is motivated by the current knowledge of relativistic outflows from gamma-ray bursts and the observed afterglow light curves. Comparison of the light curves for different jet profiles with gamma-ray burst afterglow observations provides constraints on the jet structure. One of the main results we find is that the transverse fluid velocity in the comoving frame ( v t ) and the speed of sideways expansion for smooth jet profiles is typically much smaller than the speed of sound ( c s ) throughout much of the evolution of the jet; v t approaches c s when Γ along the jet axis becomes of order a few (for a large angular gradient of , v t ~ c s while Γ is still large). This result suggests that the dynamics of relativistic structured jets may be reasonably described by a simple analytic model in which is independent of time, as long as Γ along the jet axis is larger than a few.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
“In principle, GRB jets could be structured (Zhang & Mészáros 2002b; Rossi et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2004a; Kumar & Granot 2003).”
BackgroundResultThe physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
Self-citationGAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Gamma‐Ray Burst Energetics and the Gamma‐Ray Burst Hubble Diagram: Promises and Limitations
Bloom, J. S., Frail, D. A., & Kulkarni, S. R. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377125 · Cited by 395
A complete reference of the analytical synchrotron external shock models of gamma-ray bursts
Gao, H., Lei, W.-H., Zou, Y.-C., Wu, X.-F., & Zhang, B. (2013) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2013.10.001 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, P., & Granot, J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-07-10
- Volume
- 591
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1075-1085
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2167287749
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of a Structured Relativistic Jet and Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/375186
- The paper
- Kumar, P., & Granot, J. (2003). The Evolution of a Structured Relativistic Jet and Gamma‐Ray Burst Afterglow Light Curves. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/375186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.