Cited by 97Rabies epidemiology and controlMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

Development of a Cocktail of Recombinant‐Expressed Human Rabies Virus–Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies for Postexposure Prophylaxis of Rabies

Prosniak, Mikhail, Faber, Milosz, Hanlon, Cathleen A., Rupprecht, Charles E., Hooper, D. Craig, Dietzschold, Bernhard·2003·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To provide a cost-effective and safe replacement for human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG), we used DNA recombinant technology to express 3 human rabies virus-neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies (huMAbs) in a rhabdovirus vector (RhV). Infection of either baby hamster kidney cells or CHO cells, with the resulting RhV-huMAb recombinant viruses, yielded high-level production (< or =40 micro g/mL/48 h) of RhV recombinant-expressed huMAbs (rhuMAbs) that differ in both isotype and epitope-recognition specificity. A cocktail of these rhuMAbs neutralizes several fixed and street wild-type rabies viruses (RVs). Mice and hamsters treated only once with this rhuMAb cocktail after infection with a lethal dose of RV were protected. In the mouse models, the postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) efficacy obtained with the rhuMAb cocktail was comparable to that obtained with HRIG, a finding strongly suggesting that rhuMAbs should be given serious consideration for use in future PEP of humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/375247

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The monoclonal antibody S057 (CR57) provides broad neutralization of a variety of rabies virus strains via binding to glycoprotein G.

    “we selected the monoclonal antibody S057, also well known as CR57, one component of the published mAb cocktail, because it provides broad neutralization of a variety of rabies virus strains via binding to glycoprotein G.”

    From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Prosniak et al, 2003

    The passage labeled Abstract and Table 1 identify SO57 as a cocktail component and report neutralization of several fixed and street rabies-virus strains. Our copy does not identify SO57 as CR57 or say that its neutralization occurs through binding to rabies-virus glycoprotein G; its glycoprotein discussion concerns the expression vector instead. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In 2003, a cocktail of mAbs was developed which protected Syrian hamsters from lethal challenges with a highly virulent rabies virus strain in post-exposure scenarios.

    “In 2003, a cocktail of mAbs was developed which protected Syrian hamsters from lethal challenges with a highly virulent rabies virus strain in post‐exposure scenarios (Prosniak et al, 2003).”

    From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Prosniak et al, 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dietzschold B, Wunner WH, Wiktor TJ, Lafon M, Smith CL, Koprow- ski H. Characterization of an antigenic determinant of the glycoprotein that correlates pathogenicity of fixed rabies virus strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:70-4. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/188/1/53/821718 by guest on 19 June 2023

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prosniak, M., Faber, M., Hanlon, C. A., Rupprecht, C. E., Hooper, D. C., & Dietzschold, B.
Affiliations
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Dietzschold, Bernhard
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2003-07
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
53-56
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2123301882
Cited by
97
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 450079)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Rabies epidemiology and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
rabies virus, post-exposure prophylaxis, human monoclonal antibodies, recombinant antibodies, antibody cocktail, neutralizing antibodies, CHO cell expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Specificity, Cell Line, Female, Genetic Engineering, Cricetinae, Humans, Immunization, Passive, Neutralization Tests, Rabies, Rabies virus, Recombinant Proteins, Gene Expression, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review