Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Radii of Extrasolar Giant Planets

Open access
Bodenheimer, Peter, Laughlin, Gregory, Lin, Douglas N. C.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal
DOI 10.1086/375565
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We have computed evolutionary models for extrasolar planets that range in mass from 0.1 M J to 3.0 M J and that range in equilibrium temperature from 113 to 2000 K. We present four sequences of models, designed to show the structural effects of a solid (20 M ⊕ ) core and of internal heating due to the conversion of kinetic to thermal energy at pressures of tens of bars. The model radii at ages of 4-5 Gyr are intended for future comparisons with radii derived from observations of transiting extrasolar planets. To provide such comparisons, we expect that of order 10 transiting planets with orbital periods less than 200 days can be detected around bright ( V < 10-11) main-sequence stars, for which accurate well-sampled radial velocity (RV) measurements can also be readily accumulated. Through these observations, structural properties of the planets will be derivable, particularly for low-mass, high-temperature planets. Implications regarding the transiting companion to OGLE-TR-56 recently announced by Konacki et al. are discussed. With regard to the transiting planet HD 209458b, we find, in accordance with other recent calculations, that models without internal heating predict a radius that is ~0.3 R J smaller than the observed radius. Two resolutions have been proposed for this discrepancy. Guillot & Showman hypothesize that deposition of kinetic wind energy at pressures of tens of bars is responsible for heating the planet and maintaining its large size. Our models confirm that dissipation of the type proposed by Guillot & Showman can indeed produce a large radius for HD 209458b. Bodenheimer, Lin, & Mardling suggest that HD 209458b owes its large size to dissipation of energy arising from ongoing tidal circularization of the planetary orbit. This mechanism requires the presence of an additional planetary companion to continuously force the eccentricity. We show that residual scatter in the current RV data set for HD 209458b is consistent with the presence of an as-of-yet undetected second companion and that further RV monitoring of HD 209458 is indicated. Tidal circularization theory also can provide constraints on planetary radii. Extrasolar giant planets with periods of order 7 days should be actively circularizing. We find that the observed eccentricities of e ~ 0.14 for both HD 217107b ( P = 6.276 days; M sin i = 1.80 M J ) and HD 68988b ( P = 7.125 days, M sin i = 1.29 M J ) likely indicate either relatively small planetary radii for these objects ( R ~ 1.1 R J ) or tidal quality factors in the neighborhood of Q P ~ 10 7 . For these two planets, it will be difficult to differentiate the contribution from tidal and kinetic heating. But the radius of HD 168746b ( P = 6.403 days, M sin i = 0.23 M J ) is sensitive to whether the planet's interior is heated by tidal dissipation or kinetic heating. The tidal circularization timescale of this planet is shorter than the age of its host star, but we show that within the observational uncertainties, the published RV data can also be fitted with a circular orbit for this planet. As more RV planets with periods of order 1 week are discovered, Q P ( T eq, M P ) and R P ( T eq , M P ) will become better determined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/375565

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
Bodenheimer, P., Laughlin, G., & Lin, D. N. C.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Published
2003-07-20
Volume
592
Issue
1
Pages
555-563
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
DOI
10.1086/375565
OpenAlex
W2001363009
Cited by
298
References
46
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.