The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Free Entry Be Inefficient? Fixed Commissions and Social Waste in the Real Estate Industry
Open accessAbstract
Real estate agents typically charge a 6 percent commission, regardless of the price of the house sold. As a consequence, the commission fee from selling a house will differ dramatically across cities depending on the average price of housing, although the effort necessary to match buyers and sellers may not be that different. We use a simple economic model to show that if barriers to entry are low, the entry of real estate agents in cities with high housing prices is socially inefficient. Consistent with our model, we find that when the average price of land in a city increases, (1) the fraction of real estate brokers in a city increases, (2) the productivity of an average real estate agent (houses sold per hour worked) falls, and (3) the real wage of a typical real estate agent remains unchanged. We cannot completely rule out the alternative explanation that these results reflect unmeasured differences in the quality of broker services. However, we present evidence that as the average price of housing in a city increases, there is only a small increase in the amount of time a buyer spends searching for a house, and the average time a house for sale stays on the market falls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loss Aversion and Seller Behavior: Evidence from the Housing Market
Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355301753265561 · Cited by 1,628
Cited by
Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation
Autor, D. H. (2015) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.29.3.3 · Cited by 3,917
An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners in the United States
Hall, J. V., & Krueger, A. B. (2018) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/0019793917717222 · Cited by 701
Presidential Address: Does Finance Benefit Society?
ZINGALES, L. (2015) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12295 · Cited by 355
Polanyi's Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth
Autor, D. (2014) · doi:10.3386/w20485 · Cited by 323
Diagnosing Consumer Confusion and Sub-Optimal Shopping Effort: Theory and Mortgage-Market Evidence
Woodward, S. E., & Hall, R. E. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.3249 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsieh, C., & Moretti, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1076-1122
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2141635946
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can Free Entry Be Inefficient? Fixed Commissions and Social Waste in the Real Estate Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/376953
- The paper
- Hsieh, C., & Moretti, E. (2003). Can Free Entry Be Inefficient? Fixed Commissions and Social Waste in the Real Estate Industry. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/376953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.