The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quorum‐Sensing Control of Biofilm Factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis
Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most frequent cause of nosocomial sepsis and catheter-related infections, in which biofilm formation is considered to be the main virulence mechanism. Quorum-sensing systems have been recognized as important regulators of virulence and biofilm formation in many bacteria. There is a single quorum-sensing system in S. epidermidis encoded by the agr operon. To investigate quorum-sensing control of biofilm formation, we constructed an agr deletion mutant, assayed for the different stages of biofilm formation, and determined agr-dependent regulation of biofilm factors. The agr mutant showed increased biofilm formation, primary attachment, and expression of the autolysin AtlE, but lacked delta-toxin production. However, the level of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin expression was equivalent to the isogenic wild-type strain. In contrast to AtlE, which is known to influence primary attachment, delta-toxin appeared to exert its effect on attachment to polystyrene during later stages of biofilm formation. Importantly, addition of cross-inhibiting pheromones mimicked an agr mutation and significantly enhanced biofilm formation, which suggests that care should be used when treating S. epidermidis infections with cross-inhibiting peptides. Our data demonstrate the importance of quorum sensing in the establishment of a biofilm in this critical human pathogen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis
Branda, S. S., González-Pastor, J. E., Ben-Yehuda, S., Losick, R., & Kolter, R. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191384198 · Cited by 1,129
Heilmann, C., Hussain, M., Peters, G., & Götz, F. (1997) · Molecular Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x · Cited by 700
Cited by
Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Becker, K., Heilmann, C., & Peters, G. (2014) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00109-13 · Cited by 1,628
Biofilm Dispersal: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Potential Therapeutic Uses
Kaplan, J. B. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359403 · Cited by 949
Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview
Le, K. Y., & Otto, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174 · Cited by 490
Self-citationPeptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Methicillin resistance and the biofilm phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus
McCarthy, H., Rudkin, J. K., Black, N. S., Gallagher, L., O'Neill, E., & O'Gara, J. P. (2015) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2015.00001 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Vuong, C., Gerke, C., Somerville, G. A., Fischer, E. R., & Otto, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 188
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 706-718
- ISSN
- 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6613
- OpenAlex
- W1991292439
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quorum‐Sensing Control of Biofilm Factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377239
- The paper
- Vuong, C., Gerke, C., Somerville, G. A., Fischer, E. R., & Otto, M. (2003). Quorum‐Sensing Control of Biofilm Factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/377239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.