The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents direct evidence for hierarchical galaxy assembly out to redshifts z ∼ 3. We identify major mergers using the model-independent CAS (concentration, asymmetry, clumpiness) physical morphological system on galaxies detected, and photometrically selected, in the WFPC2 and NICMOS Hubble Deep Field North. We specifically use the asymmetric distributions of rest-frame optical light measured through the asymmetry parameter ( A ) to determine the fraction of galaxies undergoing major mergers as a function of redshift ( z ), stellar mass ( M * ), and absolute magnitude ( M B ). We find that the fraction of galaxies consistent with undergoing a major merger increases with redshift for all galaxies, but most significantly, at 5–10 σ confidence, for the most luminous and massive systems. The highest merger fractions we find are 40%–50% for galaxies with M B < -21, or M * > 10 10 M ⊙ at z > 2.5, e.g., objects identified as Lyman-break galaxies. Using these results, we model the merger fraction evolution in the form f m ( A , M * , M B , z ) = f 0 × (1 + z ) . We find m A values ∼4–6 for the most luminous and massive galaxies, while lower mass and less luminous galaxies have smaller m A values. We use these merger fractions, combined with merger timescales calculated from N -body simulations, to derive galaxy merger rates to z ∼ 3. We also use stellar masses of HDF-N galaxies to determine the mass accretion rate of field galaxies involved in major mergers. We find an average stellar mass accretion rate of G ∼ 4 × 10 8 M ⊙ Gyr -1 per galaxy at z ∼ 1 for galaxies with stellar masses M * > 10 9 M ⊙ . This accretion rate changes with redshift as G = 1.6 × 10 8 (1 + z ) 0.99±0.32 M ⊙ Gyr -1 per galaxy. We also find that the fraction of stellar mass density in galaxies involved in major mergers increases with redshift, with a peak mass fraction ∼0.5 for the brightest, M B < -21, and most massive, M * > 10 10 M ⊙ , systems near z ∼ 2.5. By comparing merger fractions predicted in cold dark matter semianalytic models with our results we find a reasonably good agreement for the largest and brightest systems, although we find more low-mass galaxy mergers at lower redshifts than what these models predict.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Core condensation in heavy halos: a two-stage theory for galaxy formation and clustering
White, S. D. M., & Rees, M. J. (1978) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · Cited by 3,919
The Relationship between Stellar Light Distributions of Galaxies and Their Formation Histories
Conselice, C. J. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/375001 · Cited by 875
Self-citation
Cited by
Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Robertson, B., & Springel, V. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/499298 · Cited by 1,873
Secular Evolution and the Formation of Pseudobulges in Disk Galaxies
Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, R. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 · Cited by 1,732
The Herschel view of the dominant mode of galaxy growth from z= 4 to the present day
Schreiber, C., Pannella, M., Elbaz, D., Béthermin, M., Inami, H., Dickinson, M., Magnelli, B., Wang, T., Aussel, H., Daddi, E., et al. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425017 · Cited by 844
Self-citationA New Nonparametric Approach to Galaxy Morphological Classification
Lotz, J. M., Primack, J., & Madau, P. (2004) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/421849 · Cited by 832
THE SINS SURVEY OF z∼ 2 GALAXY KINEMATICS: PROPERTIES OF THE GIANT STAR-FORMING CLUMPS
Genzel, R., Newman, S., Jones, T., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Shapiro, K., Genel, S., Lilly, S. J., Renzini, A., Tacconi, L. J., Bouché, N., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/733/2/101 · Cited by 664
Metadata
- Authors
- Conselice, C. J., Bershady, M. A., Dickinson, M., & Papovich, C.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1183-1207
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2104393494
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377318
- The paper
- Conselice, C. J., Bershady, M. A., Dickinson, M., & Papovich, C. (2003). A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/377318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.