Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 524

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3

Open access
Conselice, Christopher J., Bershady, Matthew A., Dickinson, Mark, Papovich, Casey·2003·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

This paper presents direct evidence for hierarchical galaxy assembly out to redshifts z ∼ 3. We identify major mergers using the model-independent CAS (concentration, asymmetry, clumpiness) physical morphological system on galaxies detected, and photometrically selected, in the WFPC2 and NICMOS Hubble Deep Field North. We specifically use the asymmetric distributions of rest-frame optical light measured through the asymmetry parameter ( A ) to determine the fraction of galaxies undergoing major mergers as a function of redshift ( z ), stellar mass ( M * ), and absolute magnitude ( M B ). We find that the fraction of galaxies consistent with undergoing a major merger increases with redshift for all galaxies, but most significantly, at 5–10 σ confidence, for the most luminous and massive systems. The highest merger fractions we find are 40%–50% for galaxies with M B < -21, or M * > 10 10 M ⊙ at z > 2.5, e.g., objects identified as Lyman-break galaxies. Using these results, we model the merger fraction evolution in the form f m ( A , M * , M B , z ) = f 0 × (1 + z ) . We find m A values ∼4–6 for the most luminous and massive galaxies, while lower mass and less luminous galaxies have smaller m A values. We use these merger fractions, combined with merger timescales calculated from N -body simulations, to derive galaxy merger rates to z ∼ 3. We also use stellar masses of HDF-N galaxies to determine the mass accretion rate of field galaxies involved in major mergers. We find an average stellar mass accretion rate of G ∼ 4 × 10 8 M ⊙ Gyr -1 per galaxy at z ∼ 1 for galaxies with stellar masses M * > 10 9 M ⊙ . This accretion rate changes with redshift as G = 1.6 × 10 8 (1 + z ) 0.99±0.32 M ⊙ Gyr -1 per galaxy. We also find that the fraction of stellar mass density in galaxies involved in major mergers increases with redshift, with a peak mass fraction ∼0.5 for the brightest, M B < -21, and most massive, M * > 10 10 M ⊙ , systems near z ∼ 2.5. By comparing merger fractions predicted in cold dark matter semianalytic models with our results we find a reasonably good agreement for the largest and brightest systems, although we find more low-mass galaxy mergers at lower redshifts than what these models predict.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/377318

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 524

Metadata

Authors
Conselice, C. J., Bershady, M. A., Dickinson, M., & Papovich, C.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2003-09
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
1183-1207
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2104393494
Cited by
524
References
2
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377318
The paper
Conselice, C. J., Bershady, M. A., Dickinson, M., & Papovich, C. (2003). A Direct Measurement of Major Galaxy Mergers at z 3. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/377318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.