Cited by 68Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

The Recent Star Formation History of the M31 Disk

Open access
Williams, Benjamin F.·2003·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

The star formation history of the northern and southern M31 disk is measured using samples of BV photometry for 4' × 4' regions taken from the KPNO/CTIO Local Group Survey. The distances, mean reddening values, and age distributions of the stars in these regions were measured using the routines of Dolphin. Independent measurements of overlapping fields show that the results are stable for most samples. A slight distance gradient is seen across the major axis of the southern disk, and a mean distance of 24.47 ± 0.03 is found by combining the results. Higher mean reddening values are seen to follow the spiral structure. The stellar age distributions are consistent with episodic star formation confined mainly to the gas-rich arm regions. If these episodes were caused by propagating density waves, the waves did not cause significant star formation episodes in the gas-poor interarm regions. A combination of all of the results provides the total star formation rate for 1.4 deg 2 of the M31 disk for six epochs. These results suggest that star formation in the disk declined by ∼50% from ∼250 to ∼50 Myr ago. The lowest star formation rate occurred ∼25 Myr ago, followed by a ∼20% increase to the present. The mean star formation rate for this large portion of M31 over the past 60 Myr is 0.63 ± 0.07 M ⊙ yr -1 , suggesting a total mean rate for the disk of ∼1 M ⊙ yr -1 .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/377347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, B. F.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Benjamin F.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2003-09
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
1312-1325
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2004879649
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
M31, star formation history, disk galaxies, star formation rate, stellar age distribution, distance gradient, reddening, spiral structure, density waves, episodic star formation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review