Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Genome Scan for Modifiers of Age at Onset in Huntington Disease: The HD MAPS Study

Li, Jian-Liang, Hayden, Michael R., Almqvist, Elisabeth W., Brinkman, Ryan R., Durr, Alexandra, Dodé, Catherine, Morrison, Patrick J., Suchowersky, Oksana, Ross, Christopher A., Margolis, Russell L., Rosenblatt, Adam, Gómez-Tortosa, Estrella, Cabrero, David Mayo, Novelletto, Andrea, Frontali, Marina, Nance, Martha, Trent, Ronald J.A., McCusker, Elizabeth, Jones, Randi, Paulsen, Jane S., Harrison, Madeline, Zanko, Andrea, Abramson, Ruth K., Russ, Ana L., Knowlton, Beth, Djoussé, Luc, Mysore, Jayalakshmi S., Tariot, Suzanne, Gusella, Michael F., Wheeler, Vanessa C., Atwood, Larry D., Cupples, L. Adrienne, Saint-Hilaire, Marie, Cha, Jang-Ho J., Hersch, Steven M., Koroshetz, Walter J., Gusella, James F., MacDonald, Marcy E., Myers, Richard H.·2003·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/378133

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Andrew, 1993, The relationship between trinucleotide (CAG) repeat length and clinical features of Huntington’s disease, Nat Genet, 4, 398, 10.1038/ng0893-398 · DOI
  2. Brinkman, 1997, The likelihood of being affected with Huntington disease by a particular age, for a specific CAG size, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1202
  3. Djoussé, 2003, Interaction of normal and expanded CAG repeat sizes influences age at onset of Huntington disease, Am J Med Genet, 119A, 279, 10.1002/ajmg.a.20190 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Farrer, 1993, The normal Huntington disease (HD) allele, or a closely linked gene, influences age at onset of HD, Am J Hum Genet, 53, 125
  5. Huntington, 1872, On chorea, Med Surg Reporter, 26, 317
  6. Kegel, 2002, Huntingtin is present in the nucleus, interacts with the transcriptional corepressor C-terminal binding protein, and represses transcription, J Biol Chem, 277, 7466, 10.1074/jbc.M103946200 · DOI
  7. Kruglyak, 1996, Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach, Am J Hum Genet, 58, 1347
  8. Lander, 1995, Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results, Nat Genet, 11, 241, 10.1038/ng1195-241 · DOI
  9. MacDonald, 1999, Evidence for the GluR6 gene associated with younger onset age of Huntington’s disease, Neurology, 53, 1330, 10.1212/WNL.53.6.1330 · DOI
  10. Naze, 2002, Mutation analysis and association studies of the ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 gene in Huntington’s disease, Neurosci Lett, 328, 1, 10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00231-8 · DOI
  11. Nyholt, 2000, All LODs are not created equal, Am J Hum Genet, 67, 282, 10.1086/303029 · DOI
  12. Peters, 1999, Nuclear targeting of mutant huntingtin increases toxicity, Mol Cell Neurosci, 14, 121, 10.1006/mcne.1999.0773 · DOI
  13. Pratt, 2000, Exact multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in pedigrees by variance components, Am J Hum Genet, 66, 1153, 10.1086/302830 · DOI
  14. Ranen, 1995, Anticipation and instability of IT-15 (CAG)n repeats in parent-offspring pairs with Huntington disease, Am J Hum Genet, 57, 593
  15. Rubinsztein, 1997, Genotypes at the GluR6 kainate receptor locus are associated with variation in the age of onset of Huntington disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 94, 3872, 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3872 · DOI
  16. Saudou, 1998, Huntingtin acts in the nucleus to induce apoptosis but death does not correlate with the formation of intranuclear inclusions, Cell, 95, 55, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81782-1 · DOI
  17. Snell, 1993, Relationship between trinucleotide repeat expansion and phenotypic variation in Huntington’s disease, Nat Genet, 4, 393, 10.1038/ng0893-393 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, J.-L., Hayden, M. R., Almqvist, E. W., Brinkman, R. R., Durr, A., Dodé, C., Morrison, P. J., Suchowersky, O., Ross, C. A., Margolis, R. L., Rosenblatt, A., Gómez-Tortosa, E., Cabrero, D. M., Novelletto, A., Frontali, M., Nance, M., Trent, R. J. A., McCusker, E., Jones, R., Paulsen, J. S., Harrison, M., Zanko, A., Abramson, R. K., Russ, A. L., Knowlton, B., Djoussé, L., Mysore, J. S., Tariot, S., Gusella, M. F., Wheeler, V. C., Atwood, L. D., Cupples, L. A., Saint-Hilaire, M., Cha, J.-H. J., Hersch, S. M., Koroshetz, W. J., Gusella, J. F., MacDonald, M. E., & Myers, R. H.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
682-687
ISSN
0002-9297
Cited by
126
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review