The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Open accessAbstract
The decline of biodiversity with latitude has received great attention, but both the concise pattern and the causes of the gradient are under strong debate. Most studies of the latitudinal gradient comprise only one or few organism types and are often restricted to certain region or habitat types. To test for significant variation in the gradient between organisms, habitats, or regions, a meta-analysis was conducted on nearly 600 latitudinal gradients assembled from the literature. Each gradient was characterized by two effect sizes, strength (correlation coefficient) and slope, and additionally by 14 variables describing organisms, habitats, and regions. The analysis corroborated the high generality of the latitudinal diversity decline. Gradients on regional scales were significantly stronger and steeper than on local scales, and slopes also varied with sampling grain. Both strength and slope increased with organism body mass, and strength increased with trophic level. The body mass-effect size relation varied for ecto- versus homeotherm organisms and for different dispersal types, suggesting allometric effects on energy use and dispersal ability as possible mechanisms for the body mass effect. Latitudinal gradients were weaker and less steep in freshwater than in marine or terrestrial environments and differed significantly between continents and habitat types. The gradient parameters were not affected by hemisphere or the latitudinal range covered. This analysis is the first to describe these general and significant patterns, which have important consequences for models aiming to explain the latitudinal gradient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One of the most widely recognised phenomena in ecology is the decline in species diversity with increasing absolute latitude (Hillebrand 2004).”
From Variation in red fox Vulpes vulpes diet in five continents (2022) · cites this paper as Hillebrand 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Species Diversity in Space and Time
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623387 · Cited by 3,690
The tropics as a source of evolutionary novelty through geological time
Jablonski, D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364142a0 · Cited by 255
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00698.x · doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00698.x
- 10.1126/science.1072380 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/303400 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00364.x · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018451916734 · DOI
- 10.1086/393620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01461-X · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240106.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240106.x
- 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1999.00051.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.122241499 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1999.0766 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00265.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90222-W · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.12112.x · DOI
- 10.1086/285695 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01767-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/5503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1666/0094-8373(2000)026<0188:EOTDGI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.246.4930.675 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0304-3770(93)90072-5 · DOI
- 10.1086/285144 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682541 · DOI
- Darwin C., The origin of species by means of natural selection. J, 10.5962/bhl.title.24329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00289.x · DOI
- 10.1038/25977 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3544855 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1070710 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/383132a0 · doi:10.1038/383132a0
- 10.2307/1468034 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/374346 · DOI
- 10.4319/lo.2000.45.1.0022 · DOI
- 10.1038/417070a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1604:BAARSD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s003000100244 · doi:10.1007/s003000100244
- 10.1126/science.257.5073.1107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/345479 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00197.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00197.x
- 10.1007/s00442-002-0988-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004420000492 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2805:PFWIC]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2805:pfwic]2.0.co;2
- 10.2307/3565088 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546645 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150520 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1937717 · doi:10.2307/1937717
- 10.1073/pnas.091100998 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1072779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00207.x · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001.tb00207.x
- 10.1038/nature00809 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3546712 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01945.x · DOI
- Levin S. A., Encyclopedia of biodiversity
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00127.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35048558 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3546901 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2483:AHAOSD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1086/285719 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980215.x · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1105:REQTMA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/249583a0 · doi:10.1038/249583a0
- Peters R. H., The ecological implications of body size, 10.1017/CBO9780511608551 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/282398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/361597a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/35025052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/283474 · doi:10.1086/283474
- 10.1098/rspb.2000.1277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.071034898 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3545569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3546102 · DOI
- 10.2307/3546528 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00236.x · DOI
- 10.1080/11956860.1999.11682534 · doi:10.1080/11956860.1999.11682534
- 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00632.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00005.x · doi:10.1046/j.1472-4642.1998.00005.x
- 10.1126/science.201.4357.679 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3062:LARZSR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00577.x · DOI
- 10.1086/283239 · doi:10.1086/283239
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00266.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0545:GEATCL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/282852 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03349.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03349.x
- 10.1038/nature00830 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3544109 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., & Tarrant, S. (2011) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x · Cited by 3,874
Stochastic Community Assembly: Does It Matter in Microbial Ecology?
Zhou, J., & Ning, D. (2017) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00002-17 · Cited by 2,773
A communal catalogue reveals Earth's multiscale microbial diversity
Thompson, L. R., Sanders, J. G., McDonald, D., Amir, A., Ladau, J., Locey, K. J., Prill, R. J., Tripathi, A., Gibbons, S. M., Ackermann, G., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24621 · Cited by 2,684
Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis
Gurevitch, J., Koricheva, J., Nakagawa, S., & Stewart, G. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25753 · Cited by 1,709
Microbial community structure and its functional implications
Fuhrman, J. A. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08058 · Cited by 1,382
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillebrand, H.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192-211
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2179127468
- Cited by
- 2,085
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/381004
- The paper
- Hillebrand, H. (2004). On the Generality of the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/381004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.