Cited by 331Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyInsects and Parasite InteractionsZoonotic diseases and public health

Reptiles, Amphibians, and Human Salmonella Infection: A Population‐Based, Case‐Control Study

Mermin, Jonathan, Hutwagner, Lori, Vugia, Duc, Shallow, Sue, Daily, Pamela, Bender, Jeffrey, Koehler, Jane, Marcus, Ruthanne +2 more·2004·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

To estimate the burden of reptile- and amphibian-associated Salmonella infections, we conducted 2 case-control studies of human salmonellosis occurring during 1996-1997. The studies took place at 5 Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) surveillance areas: all of Minnesota and Oregon and selected counties in California, Connecticut, and Georgia. The first study included 463 patients with serogroup B or D Salmonella infection and 7618 population-based controls. The second study involved 38 patients with non-serogroup B or D Salmonella infection and 1429 controls from California only. Patients and controls were interviewed about contact with reptiles and amphibians. Reptile and amphibian contact was associated both with infection with serogroup B or D Salmonella (multivariable odds ratio [OR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.2; P<.009) and with infection with non-serogroup B or D Salmonella (OR, 4.2; CI, 1.8-9.7; P<.001). The population attributable fraction for reptile or amphibian contact was 6% for all sporadic Salmonella infections and 11% among persons <21 years old. These data suggest that reptile and amphibian exposure is associated with approximately 74,000 Salmonella infections annually in the United States.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/381594

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reptiles and amphibians are estimated to be responsible for 11% of all sporadic Salmonella infections among patients less than 21 years of age, and direct contact with such animals is not required for zoonotic transmission.

    “Reptiles and amphibians are estimated to be responsible for 11% of all sporadic Salmonella infections among patients less than21 years of age, 11 and direct contact with such animals is not required for zoonotic transmission.”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mermin, J., Hutwagner, L., Vugia, D., Shallow, S., Daily, P., Bender, J., Koehler, J., Marcus, R., Angulo, F. J., & the Emerging Infections Program FoodNet Working Group
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • California Health and Human Services Agency (US)
Corresponding author
Angulo, Frederick J.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2004-04-15
Volume
38
Issue
s3
Pages
S253-S261
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2157025252
Cited by
331
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 27
FWCI
18.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Insects and Parasite Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
Keywords
salmonellosis, zoonotic transmission, population attributable fraction, young children, FoodNet
MeSH terms
Amphibians, Animals, Data Collection, Humans, Information Services, Population Surveillance, Reptiles, Salmonella, Salmonella Infections, Salmonella Infections, Animal, Serotyping, United States, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review