The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinship Networks and Entrepreneurs in China’s Transitional Economy
Abstract
This research draws insights from two theoretical traditions: one is new institutionalism, which emphasizes the role of institutions, both formal and informal, in economic growth; the other is social network analysis, which highlights the role of interpersonal relations in producing and enforcing informal norms. Integrating these two approaches yields the thesis that social networks affect economic growth via enforcing informal institutions. The article focuses on the economic payoff of kinship networks in the context of China’s rural industrialization to argue that kin solidarity and kin trust played an important role in protecting the property rights of private entrepreneurs and reducing transaction costs during the early stages of market reform, when formal property rights laws were ineffective and market institutions underdeveloped. Data from 366 villages show that the strength of kinship networks has large positive effects on the count and workforce size of private rural enterprises and insignificant effects on collective enterprises.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Munger, M. C., & North, D. C. (1991) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1060065 · Cited by 24,871
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
COLEMAN, J. (2000) · Knowledge and Social Capital · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2 · Cited by 21,666
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-6637 · Cited by 16,594
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
中華人民共和国国家統計局 (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,443
Cited by
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?
Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0837 · Cited by 1,793
Imprinting: Toward a Multilevel Theory
Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.766076 · Cited by 1,576
Jia, N. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2092 · Cited by 272
Zhang, W. (2009) · Modern China · doi:10.1177/0097700408329613 · Cited by 69
Transaction Costs and Outsourcing Decisions in Small- and Medium-Sized Family Firms
Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2011) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486510396706 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, Y.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1045-1074
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1573584823
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 111.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinship Networks and Entrepreneurs in China’s Transitional Economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/382347
- The paper
- Peng, Y. (2004). Kinship Networks and Entrepreneurs in China’s Transitional Economy. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/382347
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.