Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HCN Survey of Normal Spiral, Infrared‐luminous, and Ultraluminous Galaxies

Open access
Gao, Yu, Solomon, Philip M.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We report systematic HCN J = 1-0 (and CO) observations of a sample of 53 infrared (IR) and/or CO-bright and/or luminous galaxies, including seven ultraluminous infrared galaxies, nearly 20 luminous infrared galaxies, and more than a dozen of the nearest normal spiral galaxies. This is the largest and most sensitive HCN survey of galaxies to date. All galaxies observed so far follow the tight correlation between the IR luminosity L IR and the HCN luminosity L HCN initially proposed by Solomon, Downes, & Radford, which is detailed in a companion paper. We also address here the issue of HCN excitation. There is no particularly strong correlation between L HCN and the 12 μm luminosity; in fact, of all the four IRAS bands, the 12 μm luminosity has the weakest correlation with the HCN luminosity. There is also no evidence of stronger HCN emission or a higher ratio of HCN and CO luminosities L HCN / L CO for galaxies with excess 12 μm emission. This result implies that mid-IR radiative pumping, or populating, of the J = 1 level of HCN by a mid-IR vibrational transition is not important compared with the collisional excitation by dense molecular hydrogen. Furthermore, large velocity gradient calculations justify the use of HCN J = 1-0 emission as a tracer of high-density molecular gas (≳3 × 10 4 /τ cm -3 ) and give an estimate of the mass of dense molecular gas from HCN observations. Therefore, L HCN may be used as a measure of the total mass of dense molecular gas, and the luminosity ratio L HCN / L CO may indicate the fraction of molecular gas that is dense.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/383003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Galactic center molecular clouds. II - Distribution and kinematics

    Bally, J., Stark, A. A., Wilson, R. W., & Henkel, C. (1988) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/165891 · Cited by 272 · cited 3×

    “…attempts in Galactic plane HCN, CS, and CO observations (Helfer & Blitz 1997b; McQuinn et al. 2002 and references therein), only the central region of the Galaxy has been extensively mapped with dense molecular gas tracers (e.g., CS, Bally et al. 1987, 1988; HCN, Jackson et al. 1996; Lee 1996).”
    Background

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Gao, Y., & Solomon, P. M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2004-05
Volume
152
Issue
1
Pages
63-80
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W1995088170
Cited by
497
References
1
FWCI
17.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.