The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral
Abstract
Small leaves and low specific leaf area (SLA) have long been viewed as adaptations to Mediterranean-type climates in many species of evergreen woody plants. However, paleobotanical and floristic evidence suggests that in many cases these traits originated prior to the advent of the summer-drought climate regime. In this study, molecular phylogenies and ancestral state reconstructions were used to test the hypothesis of adaptive leaf evolution in 12 lineages of evergreen shrubs in the California chaparral. Across all lineages there was a small but significant shift toward lower SLA, but there were no trends in leaf size evolution. For individual lineages, adaptive changes were detected in only three cases for SLA and in one case for leaf size. Three of these cases of evolutionary change were observed in taxa derived from cool temperate ancestors (e.g., Heteromeles). In contrast, most lineages originating from subtropical ancestors exhibited relative stasis in leaf trait evolution (e.g., Ceanothus). The absence of change suggests that ancestors of chaparral taxa had already acquired appropriate traits that contributed to their success under Mediterranean-type climates. These results illustrate how biogeographic history may influence patterns of trait evolution and adaptation and highlight the contribution of ecological sorting processes to the assembly and functional ecology of regional biotas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Exaptation—a missing term in the science of form
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300004310 · Cited by 5,136
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678
The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants
Chapin, F. S. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313 · Cited by 4,219
Plant Ecological Strategies: Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A., & Wright, I. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150452 · Cited by 3,069
From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning
Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., & Ellsworth, D. S. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.25.13730 · Cited by 2,423
Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts
Garland, T., Harvey, P. H., & Ives, A. R. (1992) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/41.1.18 · Cited by 2,151
Smith, J. M., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Alberch, P., Campbell, J., Goodwin, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., & Wolpert, L. (1985) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/414425 · Cited by 1,444
The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California.
Luteyn, J. L., & Hickman, J. C. (1993) · Brittonia · doi:10.2307/2807611 · Cited by 1,297
Cited by
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
Losos, J. B. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x · Cited by 1,728
Bartlett, M. K., Scoffoni, C., & Sack, L. (2012) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x · Cited by 1,076
Niche dynamics in space and time
Pearman, P. B., Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., & Randin, C. F. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.005 · Cited by 1,042
A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity
Donoghue, M. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801962105 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Ackerly, D. D.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 654-671
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2011988231
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/383062
- The paper
- Ackerly, D. D. (2004). Adaptation, Niche Conservatism, and Convergence: Comparative Studies of Leaf Evolution in the California Chaparral. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/383062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.