The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta‐analysis
Abstract
Ecology Letters (2012) 15: 393–405 Increasing drought is one of the most critical challenges facing species and ecosystems worldwide, and improved theory and practices are needed for quantification of species tolerances. Leaf water potential at turgor loss, or wilting (π tlp), is classically recognised as a major physiological determinant of plant water stress response. However, the cellular basis of π tlp and its importance for predicting ecological drought tolerance have been controversial. A meta‐analysis of 317 species from 72 studies showed that π tlp was strongly correlated with water availability within and across biomes, indicating power for anticipating drought responses. We derived new equations giving both π tlp and relative water content at turgor loss point (RWCtlp) as explicit functions of osmotic potential at full turgor (π o) and bulk modulus of elasticity (ε). Sensitivity analyses and meta‐analyses showed that π o is the major driver of π tlp. In contrast, ε plays no direct role in driving drought tolerance within or across species, but sclerophylly and elastic adjustments act to maintain RWCtlp, preventing cell dehydration, and additionally protect against nutrient, mechanical and herbivory stresses independent of drought tolerance. These findings clarify biogeographic trends and the underlying basis of drought tolerance parameters with applications in comparative assessments of species and ecosystems worldwide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Cited by
Anderegg, W. R. L., Klein, T., Bartlett, M., Sack, L., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Choat, B., & Jansen, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1525678113 · Cited by 882
Self-citationPlant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure
Martin‐StPaul, N., Delzon, S., & Cochard, H. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12851 · Cited by 820
Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests
McDowell, N., Allen, C. D., Anderson‐Teixeira, K., Brando, P., Brienen, R., Chambers, J., Christoffersen, B., Davies, S., Doughty, C., Duque, A., et al. (2018) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.15027 · Cited by 597
Which is a better predictor of plant traits: temperature or precipitation?
Moles, A. T., Perkins, S. E., Laffan, S. W., Flores‐Moreno, H., Awasthy, M., Tindall, M. L., Sack, L., Pitman, A., Kattge, J., Aarssen, L. W., et al. (2014) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/jvs.12190 · Cited by 481
Self-citationA catastrophic tropical drought kills hydraulically vulnerable tree species
Powers, J. S., Vargas G., G., Brodribb, T. J., Schwartz, N. B., Pérez‐Aviles, D., Smith‐Martin, C. M., Becknell, J. M., Aureli, F., Blanco, R., Calderón‐Morales, E., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15037 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartlett, M. K., Scoffoni, C., & Sack, L.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 393-405
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W1719995090
- Cited by
- 1,076
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x
- The paper
- Bartlett, M. K., Scoffoni, C., & Sack, L. (2012). The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta‐analysis. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.