Direct Constraints on the Dark Matter Self‐Interaction Cross Section from the Merging Galaxy Cluster 1E 0657−56
Open accessAbstract
We compare new maps of the hot gas, dark matter, and galaxies for 1E 0657-56, a cluster with a rare high-velocity merger occurring nearly in the plane of the sky. The X-ray observations reveal a bullet-like gas subcluster just exiting the collision site. A prominent bow shock gives an estimate of the subcluster velocity, 4500 km s -1 , which lies mostly in the plane of the sky. The optical image shows that the gas lags behind the subcluster galaxies. The weak-lensing mass map reveals a dark matter clump lying ahead of the collisional gas bullet but coincident with the effectively collisionless galaxies. From these observations, one can directly estimate the cross section of the dark matter self-interaction. That the dark matter is not fluid-like is seen directly in the X-ray-lensing mass overlay; more quantitative limits can be derived from three simple independent arguments. The most sensitive constraint, σ/ m < 1 cm 2 g -1 , comes from the consistency of the subcluster mass-to-light ratio with the main cluster (and universal) value, which rules out a significant mass loss due to dark matter particle collisions. This limit excludes most of the 0.5-5 cm 2 g -1 interval proposed to explain the flat mass profiles in galaxies. Our result is only an order-of-magnitude estimate that involves a number of simplifying, but always conservative, assumptions; stronger constraints may be derived using hydrodynamic simulations of this cluster.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If dark matter is truly collisionless, the dark matter halos should coincide with the galaxies.
“If DM is truly collisionless, the DM halos should coincide with the galaxies.”
From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as M. Markevitch et al. 2004
A significant self-interaction cross section would induce a momentum-transfer drag, resulting in an offset between the dark matter mass centroid and the galaxies.
“Conversely, a significant SICS would induce a momentumtransfer drag, resulting in an offset between the DM mass centroid and the galaxies (M.Markevitch et al. 2004;D. Harvey et al. 2015).”
From A New Robust Constraint on the Self-interaction Cross Section of Dark Matter with Double Radio Relic Clusters (2026) · cites this paper as M.Markevitch et al. 2004
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis
Milgrom, M. (1983) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/161130 · Cited by 3,316 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Govoni, F., Markevitch, M., Vikhlinin, A., VanSpeybroeck, L., Feretti, L., & Giovannini, G. 2004, ApJ, in press
- Markevitch, M., Vikhlinin, A., & Forman, W. 2002, in ASP Conf. Ser. 301, Matter and Energy in Clusters of Galaxies, ed. S. Bowyer & C.-Y. Hwang (San Francisco: ASP), 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The strong gravitational lens finding challenge
Metcalf, R. B., Meneghetti, M., Avestruz, C., Bellagamba, F., Bom, C. R., Bertin, E., Cabanac, R., Courbin, F., Davies, A., Decencière, E., et al. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832797 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
The Mismeasure of Mergers: Revised Limits on Self-interacting Dark Matter in Merging Galaxy Clusters
Wittman, D., Golovich, N., & Dawson, W. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaee77 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Jee, M. J., Park, D., & Lee, W. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae88fb · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Markevitch, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Clowe, D., Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., Jones, C., Murray, S., & Tucker, W.
- Affiliations
- Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-05-10
- Volume
- 606
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 819-824
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1991911062
- Cited by
- 942
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0407485)
- Smithsonian Institution
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS8-39073)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (342/3-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- dark matter self-interaction, cross section constraints, Abell 520, cluster mergers, Bullet Cluster, bow shock, weak gravitational lensing, dark matter clumps, mass-to-light ratio, galaxy mass profiles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review