Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 477

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Theory of Diversity-Stability Relationships in Ecology

Goodman, Daniel·1975·The Quarterly Review of Biology

Abstract

About twenty years ago, the belief, traditional among ecologists, that complex natural communities are more stable than simple ones was given formal expression in a way that seemed to offer promise of both precise empirical tests and further theoretical development. The elaboration of theoretical models at first yielded gratifying results suggesting reasons why complex ecological systems should indeed be more stable, but these models suffered from questionable analogies and the use of peculiar and unrealistic mathematical representations. The broad scope of the diversity-stability hypothesis, and its particular implications, elevated it to a position importance in practical debates concerning resource management, pest control, and preservation of natural areas. Observational confirmation of the diversity-stability hypothesis never materialized. In this paper we review the development of the diversity-stability hypothesis, evaluate attempts to support or refute it, and suggest an alternate perspective for interpreting population stability. We conclude that there is no simple relationship between diversity and stability in ecological systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/408563

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 477

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, D.
Venue
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Published
1975-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
237-266
ISSN
  • 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7718
OpenAlex
W1979665911
Cited by
477
References
0
FWCI
29.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Theory of Diversity-Stability Relationships in Ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/408563
The paper
Goodman, D. (1975). The Theory of Diversity-Stability Relationships in Ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/408563

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.