The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds
Abstract
Alloparental care and adoption of young, aparently altruistic and reproductively costly behaviors, have been reported in over 120 mammalian and 150 avian species. Members of these taxonomically and ecologically diverse species often share similar behavioral and sociecological strategies in parental care, and may practice strikingly convergent forms of allopareting, such as "babysitting" behavior. Individuals that care for alien young may acquire selective advantages associated with increased inclusive fitness, parental experience, reciprocal altruis, and exploitation of fostered young. In many cases, environmental constraints, such as scare breeding resources of food sources requiring cooperative foraging strategies, appear to influence the occurrence of allopareting and adoption. In addition, proximate factors incorporating "reproductive errors" may be involved in some instances of fostering, Often, several selective benefits, along with various environmental pressures or reproductives mistakes may collectively promote the evolution of alloparental care and adoption. Fostering behaviors have been reported especially often in animals characterized by one or more of the following reproductive or social features, most of which are typical of K-selected species: (1) production of single offspring; (2) prolonged or energetically intensive parental investment; (3) limited lifetime reproductve output; (4) smal groups with tight kinship bonds; (5) highly social or cooperative group structure; and (6) young that are raised in high-density breeding colonies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin
Dölen, G., Darvishzadeh, A., Huang, K. W., & Malenka, R. C. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12518 · Cited by 1,161
Cooperative breeding in mammals
Jennions, M. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90202-x · Cited by 300
Allomothering among African elephants
Lee, P. C. (1987) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(87)80234-8 · Cited by 253
Olazábal, D. E. (2014) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.10.002 · Cited by 35
Anastassacos, N., Hailes, S., & Musolesi, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6190 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Riedman, M. L.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1982-12
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 405-435
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2047139279
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/412936
- The paper
- Riedman, M. L. (1982). The Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/412936
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.