The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inferring Evolutionary Process from Phylogenetic Tree Shape
Open accessAbstract
Inferences about macroevolutionary processes have traditionally depended solely on the fossil record, but such inferences can be strengthened by also considering the shapes of the phylogenetic trees that link extant taxa. The realization that phylogenies reflect macroevolutionary processes has led to a growing literature of theoretical and comparative studies of tree shape. Two aspects of tree shape are particularly important: tree balance and the distribution of branch lenghts. We examine and evaluate recent developments in and connections between these two aspects, and suggest directions for future research. Studies of tree shape promise useful and powerful tests of macroevolutionary hypotheses. With appropriate further research, tree shape may help us detect mass extinctions and adaptive radiations, measure continuos variation in speciation and extinction rates, and associate changes in these rates with ecological or biogeographical causes. The usefulness of tree shape extends well beyond the study of macroevolution. We discuss applications to other areas of biology, including coevolution, phylogenetic inference, population biology, and developmental biology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins.
ZUCKERKANDL, E., & PAULING, L. (1965) · Evolving Genes and Proteins · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2734-4.50017-6 · Cited by 3,020
Maddison, W. P. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05937.x · Cited by 533
Onshore-Offshore Patterns in the Evolution of Phanerozoic Shelf Communities
Jablonski, D., Sepkoski, J. J., Bottjer, D. J., & Sheehan, P. M. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.222.4628.1123 · Cited by 307
Cited by
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494 · Cited by 1,201
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156
Matsen, F. A., Kodner, R. B., & Armbrust, E. V. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 · Cited by 1,050
Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates
Alfaro, M. E., Santini, F., Brock, C., Alamillo, H., Dornburg, A., Rabosky, D. L., Carnevale, G., & Harmon, L. J. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811087106 · Cited by 833
Ecological opportunity and the origin of adaptive radiations
YODER, J. B., CLANCEY, E., DES ROCHES, S., EASTMAN, J. M., GENTRY, L., GODSOE, W., HAGEY, T. J., JOCHIMSEN, D., OSWALD, B. P., ROBERTSON, J., et al. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02029.x · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Mooers, A. O., & Heard, S. B.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-54
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2117055771
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring Evolutionary Process from Phylogenetic Tree Shape. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/419657
- The paper
- Mooers, A. O., & Heard, S. B. (1997). Inferring Evolutionary Process from Phylogenetic Tree Shape. The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/419657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.